免费文献传递   相关文献

Response of Stem and Leaf Traits of Thermopsis lanceolata to Different Grassland Management Strategies and the Allometric Growth

披针叶黄华茎叶性状对不同草地管理措施的响应及其生长关系研究



全 文 :!23" !3#
 Vol.23  No.3
! " # $
ACTA AGRESTIA SINICA
   2015$  5%
  May.  2015
犱狅犻:10.11733/j.issn.10070435.2015.03.007
89:ó;<:дÁ€*+=l˜™o
Õ>1fÑ"8045
ƒŒ
1,2,
Ž~
2,
‘
1,
’“”
2,
•–—
2,
˜ ™2,š‰›1
(1.ÆÇ®÷à. ]÷./,ÆÇ ò`730070;2.8¸®÷à.×&-„./ ]4ÌÍn,„À100193)
67

P&]Ñû‚è]4¼b¡ ]C2cX
(犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪)_ÌÍ<Ä,:;‹òÓ*、M~j³
°±

M~+±k+^z+yf)3`‹ŒIË5,tSC2cXK2ñ=<‹Œ]4Ô5°±IÖ­,K¶2
.hIñ··ùQ|ñò©­ñ

€a+›

³°±œ‹ƒ‰C2cXI2.ñ=z{

¶³°±¬t

Ó*œ‹ùú‰‘6ž&K¹~
(犘<0.05);‹ŒÔ5°±Ë5C2cX2·、2³¶2Žgh,t2~¶
K¹~ghvß»ÇIRûñ··ù

²2¹~¶K¹~ghßûñ··ù

‹ŒI]4Ô5°±ôÛ:;Õ
Öñ·ô¶IÅæÏæÕÖÃ×ghIñ··ù

M~<[\]4†C2cXKj2.Iñ·XO>aP‹
5(

üNUVŒŽ€±k
、^
z

yf³Ô5°±uô£|KØâ>I*]

89:

C2cX

]4Ô5°±

A2à4

Rûñ·
;<,-=
:S541.9    >?@AB:A     >CD=:10070435(2015)03047607
犚犲狊狆狅狀狊犲狅犳犛狋犲犿犪狀犱犔犲犪犳犜狉犪犻狋狊狅犳犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪狋狅
犇犻犳犳犲狉犲狀狋犌狉犪狊狊犾犪狀犱犕犪狀犪犵犲犿犲狀狋犛狋狉犪狋犲犵犻犲狊犪狀犱狋犺犲犃犾狅犿犲狋狉犻犮犌狉狅狑狋犺
WURuixin1,2,SHAOXinqing2,HUXinzhen1,ZHONGMengying2,
WEIXiaoting2,PANDuo2,ZHANGDegang1
(1.ColegeofPrataculturalScience,GansuAgriculturalUniversity,Lanzhou,GansuProvince730070,China;
2.GrasslandScienceDepartment,ColegeofAnimalScienceandTechnology,ChinaAgriculturalUniversity,Beijing100193,China)
犃犫狊狋狉犪犮狋:Thestudyon犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪wascarriedouttoidentifytheresponseofstemandleaf
traitstodifferentgrasslandmanagementmeasures(grazing,fencingandcomprehensivecultivations).
Fromgrowthrelationshipperspectiveofstemandleaf,thealometricgrowthrelationshipofstem,leafand
individualsizeandtheecologicaladaptationof犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪wereinvestigatedhere.Theresults
indicatedthattheleaftraitssignificantlydecreasedincomprehensivecultivationtreatmentthanfencingand
grazingtreatment(犘<0.05).Comparedwiththecomprehensivecultivationtreatment,grazingtreatment
significantlyincreasedthestemweight(犘<0.05).Therewerealometricrelationshipsbetweentheleaf
area,leaflengthandleafbreadth,betweenthespecificleafweightandstemdrymatter.While,approxi
mateisometricgrowthwasfoundbetweentotalleafdrymattersandstemdrymatter.Differentgrassland
managementmeasureshaddifferentaffectiononthestemandleaftraitsof犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪.Itwas
foundthatfencingtreatmentcouldnotcontrolthenoxiousweedeffectively,sothecomprehensivecultiva
tionswouldbeabettersolutiontocontrolthenoxiousweed.
犓犲狔狑狅狉犱狊:犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪;Grasslandmanagementmeasures;Individualsize;Alometricgrowth
EFGH
:20140916;IJGH:20150402
KLMN

›JñW÷

®÷

-Ìß¿
(201203006);¸ ¹-„º»¼^(2012BAC01B02)ÀÁ
OPQR

ë³Æ
(1982),á,>„pr§,ÊËÌÍñ,mVÏÐ]4ñòj ¡ñò.փIÌÍ,Email:wurxgrass@163.com;:
6x×Authorforcorrespondence,Email:zhangdg@gsau.edu.cn
  è$:,ž&ñ=¶(jñòùúóôgh
·ùIÌ͜…n_ñò.jÃþ—\ÌÍI<
Ý
[12]。
2.˜ž&:;=x¤ôKÄIz~V
óô€›

æKmVIóô˜&5º)

fñ&..
Qóô†2.jKðâ´JJKI˜ù

ž&Jï
à4j2.à4I¬·ñôÛ./2.fñ\jÉ
.ñ&.֎IóôUy

mVݞ&K†I2À
"[3]。
â
!3# ë³Æ:C2cXK2ñ=<‹Œ]4Ô5°±IÖ­Q|ñ··ùÌÍ
ÌÍø_ž&IRûñ·˜ŸŠ‹ŒQ«NOñ
&"J{ãRImVûü
[4],¸
øñ&A2IJ{
j¡QÏRûñ·”•

ñ&A2IRûñ·zI
˜ñ&2Ë¥HII¬<ñ·û涇¥`HII
¬<ñ·û括I¥`Hñ
[5],
Ÿø_˜Ý&
`ãäñn½ˆI¥A+ˆHñ

ôÛÕÖñ&A
2Iñ&"J{

À?£¤FGPQñ&2<‹Œ
ñò(I©­ñ

C2cX
(犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪)JÞå
hi

&

®‚

‚„

ÿ0



ÆÇ

1.

¥¦
4@

PQÇPØjhi

˜¥`*šªIâ¡
ž&
,`
rjÃ]ùvPdï¹)8¡
[6]。
ÝÞè
$:*@`)G"ù·

PQxÿ¹h

Ù†‡

]ûñò(œ……,
ÑÒ]4ûñ4Uño•
*]`™Î´Ÿ4

C2cXÈÉHÌIA2M
ò

S/I©­¹xÿIô.

ß,qœ…Ž?I
”•

Ž~ÕÖ]4)*÷’“j]ûñòùúu
)

¥á
,¸
å¸ø.×ۓ[\]4 ¡„…I
ÌÍ

YZMD~;

ôõ

yf
、^
z

±k

C"D
Q¡ ]*ü

_ÑÒ].ñò(IՋ¶é
ê¦R‰5’j„…º»

<¡ ]b[\]
4

õö°¤ü])vPâ>]O]48IC2
cX

-˜ŒŽÔ<]48|ýž&Mn¡D


£¤ü])¢Ôâ®üʍ

ED]4ñò(I
ËÌ

üN

ۓâ·C2cXÀ?£¤Q|ñ
ò©­ñÌÍ

°¤ñò]OIÖ³5W¡ ]*
üðâ´J~VIñò. ¨

¥á
,¸
ø.×Ì
͉C2cX`r»’
[79]、
ä+f"
[1011]、
ñ&
D
[12]、
mV\.nJ
[6]、`
™IJj¡
[13]



ÏC2cXK¶2Iñ··ù€$

ÑÅC2
cX`™À?Jj¡P×Å|ñ·ýO֎I
ÌÍiS_:Æ

@ÞN

?ÓÌ͋ŒÔ5°±
F4†C2cX`™

JK‹ŒÔ5°±Ë5
C2cX`™Kj2Ix`ÐñHI



2
³

2Ž

2.G"

2¹~

K¹~jt2~

I
Ö­

¶·C2cX`™K¶2.ghIñ··
ùQ|ñò©­ñ

cf_&]Ñû4@Iñò 
¡~Õj¡ ]*ü¦R5’LHjJÍ

1 STUVW
1.1 45$?Z[
íîF4fÆÇ(ÆT`.>A/-s


&]Ñû‚„è
(E102°25′21″,N35°06′46″),w
3050m[20]。ð⛜IÑûàÊñxÿHÝ,$v
xy1.6℃,7%9øzÑxy28.4℃,1%9øz
ƒxy-29.8℃。$²à2296h,≥0℃$â>
y1642℃,ðâSàIÎÏyã。$É"400~
500mm,Ù<Œ†,ÉmVÊ8f*]ñ·lm
I7—9%。/âÐ<ÿ5#,ž&ñ·#_120~
140d。íî]4YBab_&Ñr].Y,YB
pH_7.8,âýÀ¯"_6.81%,û>Œ¯"_
145.83mg·kg-1,û>ů"_14.67mg·kg-1,
û>¿¯"_115.60mg·kg-1[14]。žŸab_
ÑÒ].

Ðц*

]4q,›œI[,
žŸ
Pž]-jQ1bŸ?-ž&_m

ŒŽ§ñà"
 a]

mVž&âABCD]
(犈犾狔犿狌狊狀狌狋犪狀狊
Griseb.)、HIŸ(犘狅犪犪狀狀狌犪 L.)、]Ò(犚犪狀狌狀
犮狌犾狌狊犼犪狆狅狀犻犮犪狊 Thunb.)、JBê](犃犵狉狅狆狔狉狅狀
犮狉犻狊狋犪狋狌犿 L.)、C2cX、ÑûTÓ(犈犾狊犺狅犾狋狕犻犪
犳犲犱犱犲犻Levl.)、.>[](犓狅犫狉犲狊犻犪狊狇狌犪犿犪犲犳狅狉犿犻狊
Y.C.Yang)、òÔ](犔犪狀犮犲犪狋犻犫犲狋犻犮犪 Hook.f.et
Thoms)、ÆÇÕ](犆犪狉犲狓犽犪狀狊狌犲狀狊犻狊Nelmes)、Æ
Çh µ ¨
(犌狌犲犾犱犲狀狊狋犪犲犱狋犻犪 犵犪狀狊狌犲狀狊犻狊 H.P.
Tsui)、J{;(犕犲犾犻狊狊犻狋狌狊狉狌狋犺犲狀犻犮犪(L.)Sojak)、à
ÖA
(犃狉狋犲犿犻狊犻犪狊犻犲狏犲狉狊犻犪狀犪EhrhartexWild)、R
M
(犛狋犻狆犪犪犾犻犲狀犪 Keng)、×2ØÙ](犔犪犵狅狋犻狊
犪犾狌狋犪犮犲犪W.W.Smith)、øaÚap(犘狋犲狉狅犮狔狆狊犲犾犪
犾犪犮犻狀犻犪狋犪(Houtt.)Shih)、Ãa2cde(犘狅狋犲狀狋犻犾
犾犪犫犻犳狌狉犮犪 L.)、ij](犔犲狅狀狋狅狆狅犱犻狌犿犾犲狅狀狋狅狆狅
犱犻狅犻犱犲狊(Wild.)Beauv.)。
1.2 Ö×ØgU@`VW
2012—2013$ñ·†(5—9%),fÌÍ@p×
[\Se¥Šç4•S_uwI[\]490hm2
x_íîF4

fíîF4咔Ã"ý‹òÓ
*

M~j³Ô5°±3`‹ŒI]4Ô5°±,
‘4@Ž_10hm2,‘AË53A~¡,9A
4@

|8

³Ô5°±_M~+±k+^z+
yf

±kË5_fñ·†6%†B±¤¡kÅ
½þÃÛ
(NH4)2HPO4,±k"_75kg·hm-2,Œ
Ž°¤ýd6Üjh«_30cm,j®_10cm,ŒŽ¶yfABCD
]¬€

f"_25kg·hm-2。Ó*]4Ž_
30hm2,Ó*/ePÇSŽ]4†I”)":¼
j
,1än$IJ¬eÞ3AYÇS[15],Ó*¹)m
V_ˆÝ#IJ

Ó*Žh_5—9%,Ó*/e_
18YÇS·hm-2。
774
! " # $ !23"
2013$8%†Bf3`‹Œ]4Ô5°±Ë
5I9A4@8,)"ýp“106ËÞLa#IC
2cXnIž6

,5WJ«jU

¤"Н
"6Ñ¢Ó¬©â34Þ±I_~¨8

Ófê®
8Uª“îÞ5WÞåJK

‡+Á‘6ž&I
JïGj‘6ž&I 2 . G "
(No.ofleaf,
LN)[16]。‘6p“10.”ÃߓÛI2.,P‘
Aà=¡2†I3A42_¥AÇSJ*¤árâ
ár”ïI2.

¤ÞJK2·
(leaflength,LL)、

(leafwidth,LW)j2Ž(leafarea,LA)。¤
ImageProPlus6.0ÉOˆ‘.2.ILL、LW
jLA,ˆLLjLW _‘A¡2†3.42Iu

,LA_‘A¡2†3.42I²j。‘6ž
&IKj2.J*òÞ65℃SR48h¢9~,Á
‘6ž&IK¹~
(stemdrymatter,SW)j²2¹
~
(totalleafdrymatter,TLW)。€2¹~j
LA ¼ j t 2 ~ (specificleaf weight,SLW,
g·cm-2)=2¹~/2Ž。
1.3 ij,c
¤SPSS17.0ú¼ÉO<‹Œ]4Ô5°±
C2cXIK2ñ=z{5WÇü¥=ÉuIJ
Göî

ø~tS°¤z4œ‹ãG³
(LSD)5W。
¤wx{Á)z{vðIãRœ‹ñ€a¶JK

¼jC2cXK2ñ=ghI1k¬·ùG

Ò>P‘AF4306C2cXK2ñ=I
uvðÚ+ŠF4C2cXIK2ñ=ð


£GHãlòJ

Ò>
P10
_@

5W{%\}ä¢!5WJK

?íî8p“
IC2cXKj2.IÐñmVYZ
:LL,LW,
LA,SW,SLW j TLW。|8,PSW +ÅKà
4
,LA +Å2à4,SLW _2¹~¶ LA It
ð
[16]。
‹ŒÐñghI·ù¤ÖS狔=a狓b :r
;

í狓j狔J*_n͆I‹ŒÐñ,b_Ðñ·ùI

,a_Ã×·ùIÅæ,#ۘ¬<ñ·IzG
(aÞ1Ž_ûñ·;aàÞ64Þ1Ž_Rû
ñ·
)[16]。
GHJKmV°¤{%\må
(stand
ardizedmajoraxis,SMA)JKIÖ³[17],Rûñ·
ÖSIJG3¼°¤{%\må3¼Ö³
[18],
ÝÉ
O
(S)MATRVersion2.0[19]¼j”n。P†JK
v°¤RÉO(3.1.3)ISmatrY(3.4.3)5W。
2 mnU,c
2.1 €*+=l˜™á89:ó;<:Ao
д“”
Ý+1vÀ,³Ë5F48C2cXI
LL、LW j LA œ‹ƒÞÓ*jM~Ë5(犘<
0.05),Ó*Ë5F48C2cXLLjLAœ‹
ƒÞM~Ë5
(犘<0.05),3`‹ŒIË5gh
SLW ãR‹œ‹。‹ŒË5ghC2cX‘6
ž&LNãR‹œ‹,Ó*Ë5jM~Ë5F48
C2cX‘6ž&SW œ‹àÞ³°±Ë5
(犘<0.05),Ó*Ë5F48C2cX‘6ž&
TLW œ‹àÞ³°±Ë5(犘<0.05)。
q1 €*+=l˜™á89:ó;o<:Aд
Table1 Thestemandleaftraitsof犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪underdifferentmanagementmeasures
Ë5
Treatment
Ó*
Grazing
M~
Fencing
³°±
Comprehensivetreatment
2·Leaflength/cm 3.82±0.2309b 4.38±0.5242a 3.56±0.3266c
2³Leafbreadth/cm 0.97±0.0888a 0.92±0.0608b 0.71±0.2600c
2ŽLeafarea/cm2 7.78±4.9761b 8.74±2.7793a 5.70±9.9463c
t2~Specificleafweight/g·cm-2 0.01±0.0003a 0.01±0.0001a 0.01±0.0003a
2.G"No.ofleaf 31.43±2.8875a 30.13±0.9615a 30.63±1.3956a
²2¹~Totalleafdrymatter/g 1.67±0.0541b 2.02±0.0548a 1.29±0.1548c
K¹~Stemdrymatter/g 1.15±0.0303a 1.12±0.0601a 0.78±0.1258b
  •:+8GH_uvð±{%©。ŒW‹Œ4…wx+ÅãRœ‹(犘<0.05)
Note:Thedatainthetableareshowedbyaverage±standarderror.Differentlowcaseinthesamerowindicatesignificantdifferenceatthe
0.05level.
2.2 89:ó;<:дñòod8Ð
Ý+2vÀ,C2cXI LA¶ LL、LW
gh
,SW ¶ LL、LW、LA gh,TLW ¶ LL、
LW、LA、SW gh,SLW ¶ LN、SW、TLW g
hvß9œ‹Il¬··ù
(犘<0.01)。
874
!3# ë³Æ:C2cXK2ñ=<‹Œ]4Ô5°±IÖ­Q|ñ··ùÌÍ
q2 89:ó;<:дòoBCDd80i
Table2 ThePearson’scorrelationcoefficientsofstemandleaftraitsin犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪
¿¥
Item

Leaflength/cm

Leafbreadth/cm
2Ž
Leafarea/cm2
2.G"
No.ofleaf
K¹~
Stemdrymatter/g
²2~
TotalLeafdrymatter/g
2³Leafbreadth/cm 0.599
2ŽLeafarea/cm2 0.748 0.813
2.G"No.ofleaf 0.007 0.084 0.036
K¹~Stemdrymatter/g 0.238 0.430 0.418 -0.075
²2~TotalLeafdrymatter/g 0.414 0.378 0.446 -0.041 0.833
t2~Specificleafweight/g·cm-2 0.093 0.051 0.031 -0.704 0.534 0.594
  •:+8+Å0.05Éuœ‹¬·,Ú+0.01Éu9œ‹¬·
Note:representssignificantcorrelation(犘<0.05);representsextremelysignificantcorrelation(犘<0.01)
2.4 89:ó;:"、:EU:vwoÑ"80
݉1vÀ,‹Œ]4Ô5°±Ë5F48
C2cXILL、LW jLAgh_œ‹l¬·
·ù
(犘<0.01)。:;SMAJKKq3`‹Œ
]4Ô5°±Ë5C2cXLL、LW ¶LA
ghß»ÇIRûñ··ù

¶Ó*¬t

M~
Ë5ùú‰C2cX LL¶ LA ghISMA
Åæ

ƒ‰LW ¶LAghISMAÅæ;¶M
~¬t

³°±Ë5ƒ‰ LL¶ LAghI
SMAÅæ,ùú‰LW ¶LAghISMAÅæ。
M~Ë5F48C2cX LL¶ LA ghI
SMAÅæzÑ,_0.621(95%ò6@h,犆犐=
0.546~0.706),Rûñ·ÖS_犢=0.621犡+
0.058(犚2=0.889,犘<0.01);³°±Ë5F
48

C2cX LW j LAghISMAÅæ


_0.611(95%ò6@h,犆犐 =0.547~
0.682),Rûñ·ÖS_犢=0.611犡-0.605
(犚2=0.918,犘<0.01)。
<1 €*+=l˜™`+89:ó;:"、:E:vwo80
Fig.1 Relationshipsbetweenleaflength,leafwidthandleafareaof犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪underdifferentmanagementmeasures
•
:A、B_Ó*Ë5,C、D_~;Ë5,E、F_³°±Ë5。Œ
Note:AandBaregrazingtreatment,CandDarefencingtreatment,EandFarecomprehensivecultivationtreatment.Thesameasbelow
974
! " # $ !23"
2.5 89:ó;:F§、“:§U݉2vÀ,3`‹Œ]4Ô5°±Ë5C
2cXISW、TLW ¶SW gh_œ‹l¬·
·ù
(犘<0.01)。:;SMAJKKq3`]4Ô
5°± TLW ¶SW IÅæ_0.937~0.977
(犚2>0.773,犘<0.01),TLW ¶SW ghßû
ñ·

Ã6ž&2.¹~Iù·ûeOèSW Iù
·ûe
;3`Ë5F48C2cXSLW ¶SW
ghß»ÇIRûñ··ù
,SMAÅæ_0.473
~0.629,³°±Ë5F48SLW ¶SW gh
ISMAÅæzÑ,_0.629(95%ò6@h:犆犐
=0.512~0.773),Rûñ·ÖS_犢=0.629犡
+1.207,犚2=0.712。íî€a+›,3`]4Ô
5°±C2cX TLW Iù·ûeOèSW
Iù·ûe
,SLW Iù·ûe4Þ SW Iù·
ûe

<2 €*+=l˜™`+89:ó;G:F§、“:§UFig.2 Relationshipsbetweentotalleafdrymatter,specificleafweightandstemdrymatterof犜犺犲狉犿狅狆狊犻狊犾犪狀犮犲狅犾犪狋犪
underdifferentmanagementmeasures
3 œ
3.1 89:ó;<、:дÁ€*+=l˜™o
Õ>
ž&ñ=HI_©­‹ŒI(—\ôےñ
¥ùæ4—

<˜ü_ž&_©­¹€_PvPf
ñ!ê<†5W¬­I4—

ž&I+bHI#
Ԓñ—[20]。
ž&™š8‹Œ&`<ÞCÙ¹
€IÖ­‹‹Œ

Ïædïž&`™×ò’ñ—

5æ¾nž&™š«n’ñ¬­I4—

zæ<
žŸ;SjñòùúóôÍñ¬­IÕÖ
[2122]。
¥
zø_

±k]4Ô5°±:šÔ¾n4†ï

2
jKñ&"Iùú
[2325]。
?íî’,

¶Ó*jM
~Ë5¬t

³°±œ‹ƒ‰F48C2c
XILL、LW、LAjTLW。Reich[26]Ì͒,,
SLW|àIž&<ÇSŽ2.I6ÀÛ¬ø,â
084
!3# ë³Æ:C2cXK2ñ=<‹Œ]4Ô5°±IÖ­Q|ñ··ùÌÍ
£Þ¦ÑÀ?£¤>æ
[27]。
?íî€a+›

‹Œ
I]4Ô5°±/âÕ֞&ISLW。30Â

[28]
(犔犲狔犿狌狊犮犺犻狀犲狀狊犻狊(Trin.)Tzvel.)2
.IÌ͒,

¶·#M~¬t

·#Ó*£KY]
K2ñ=+,_›œI4b。
?í¶g¥
Š

¶M~Ë5¬t

Ó*]4ÝÞ¹)I°wj¹
€

YB€›jÉJ=GSã

ƒ‰žŸILLj
LA;¶³°±Ë5¬t,Ó*Ë5œ‹ùú‰C
2cX‘6ž&ISW;³°±Ë5F48C
2cX2.Ià4jŽ4ÞÓ*jM~Ë5

3.2 89:ó;<:rдñòod8Ð
¤ž&óôñ=ÚÆð2Iž&`

vP%‡
ôKñòùú<(—\Ö­I?À.­67P,
(à"I+jŽh
[29]。
NC

iâÌ̀a+›

¶óôñ=j(ürghI·ù¬t

ž&óô
ñ=ghI·ù¬úTˆ
。Wright[30]IÌÍ+
›
,6`mVIž&2.óôñ=hîfúûIl
¬··ù

çp‚
[31]
jèé
[32]
Ì̀a+›
‹ŒxÿUhnIWž&j‹Œ’;Éùê$ë
(犃犮犲狉犿狅狀狅Maxim)ILAj2¹~ghœ‹l¬
·

?íîfC2cXILA¶2.¹~·ù†
Kq¶g¬ÙI€’

?íîÌ͒,fC2c
XKj2.ghß,œ‹4l¬··ù

<¶ì/
ˆ
[27]
j~ѽ
[3]
f]íIï

2ñ&"PQl
?ž&4ï¹~j2.¹~ÌÍKqI€’¥Š

3.3 89:ó;:A、ž&ï

2Iñ&"Q|J{ôÛ<ž&Iñ
·Íñ0OÕÖ

ïNfž&ñ·;S8ôÛïØ
ŸÉPQýlº»Ix¤

æ2.ôÛ:;=x
¤5WÄI+ˆ

ï

2óôghIu)˜ž&ÒD
ñ·I¥A~Vñ&.Hñ

Rûñ·Î|I5’
ÌÍ

é풓nr;מ&Mò€›tu·ùI
¥`Wgâ>I5’

:;+¤Rûñ·I5’<
ž&ñ·ûæ†Ivîñ5WJK

‰Ýž&fÀ
?J{†Ivîñ

âÁÞ5¥z‰ÝοI©­
ýO
[5]。
2.¶Kgh_Rûñ··ù

ž&K¶
2.ghIñ··ùôÛ0OÕ֞&4†UIÀ
?J{jLAº)>æ,ÏæÕÖ|}“=ôjô
“ÄIô.
[33]。
ì/ˆ
[27]
j~ѽ
[3]
J*’
,]íjl?ž&ï

2ñ&"gh_Rûñ··
ù

3ï
[20]
’,U¡
(犛狋犲犾犾犲狉犪犮犺犪犿犪犲犼犪狊犿犲L.)
SW ¶TLW gh#ߜ‹4Rûñ··ù。?í
î’,3`]4Ô5°±C2cX TLW ¶
SW ghßûñ··ù,<¶3&Å[34]<½
О&Kj2ñ&"·ùÌÍI€a¥Š



[20]
’,U¡SLW ¶SW ßRûñ··ù,SLW
Iùúûeœ‹àÞSWIùúûe。?íî’,
C2cXISLW ¶SW ñ··ù¶g¬Ù,ð
âSÑI
C2cXjU¡2.ð⋌I2.ñ=HÝ

C2cXI2.¬<‡æà

Kj2.ñ&"I
ùúûe¥Š

ŒŽðâSƒIt2~

<./‰ž
&ôۈH_PIHÝ°¤‹ŒIKj2.IÀ?
J{‹:©­(I—。
4 m
ž&ôÛ:;4—K2ñ=<‹Œ]4Ô5°
±5WÖ­

‹ŒÔ5°±Ë5C2cXLL、
LW¶LAgh,SLW ¶SW ghvß»ÇIRû
ñ··ù
,TLW ¶SW ghßûñ··ù,‹Œ
I]4Ô5°±ôÛ:;ÕÖñ·ô¶IÅæÏæ
ÕÖâ×ghIñ··ù

M~<[\]4†C
2cXKj2.Iñ·XO>aP‹5(

üNU
VŒŽ€±k
、^
z

yf³Ô5°±uô£
|KØâ>I*]

žŸ>?
[1] MengTT,NiJ,HarrisonSP.Plantmorphometrictraitsand
climategradientsinnorthernChina:a metaanalysisusing
quadratandfloradata[J].AnnalsofBotany,2009,104(6),
12171229
[2] HarrisonSP,PrenticeIC,BarboniD,犲狋犪犾.Ecophysiological
andbioclimaticfoundationsforaglobalplantfunctionalclassi
fication[J].JournalofVegetationScience,2010,21(2),300
317
[3] ~ѽ.šñjš2ò2l?ž&4ïåñ&"J{·ùÌ
Í

Rûñ·JK
[J].ž&ÌÍ,2011,31(4):472477
[4] MulerN,SchnelerJJ,HoldereggerR.Variationinbreeding
systemamongpopulationsofthecommonwoodlandherb犃
狀犲犿狅狀犲狀犲犿狅狉狅狊犪(Ranunculaceae)[J].PlantSystematicsand
Evolution,2000,221(1/2):6976
[5] ʕ½,Š·ó,!\&,.ž&I+bvîñ、Rûñ·Q
|¬¾ô.
[J].ñò. ¯,2007,26(9):14381444
[6] 3ï,­Ò³,–.n.C2cXI\.nJÌÍ[J].®÷
-.ÌÍ
,2008,29(4):6869
[7] §5,–ï,ô•,.=à、ye、YBÉJjf`®e2cX`r»’Q„…ñ·IÕÖ
[J].]÷-.,2011,28
(9):16401644
184
! " # $ !23"
[8] –ï,è,ô•,.ê;rjê›;`r»’<¹4#I
Ö­HI
[J].ÉYé):¸.2012,32(2):109113
[9] ~Ó£,›Êõ,öÕ÷,.C2cX`rø“¶»’Hñ
ÌÍ
[J].`r,2009,28(4):8891
[10]U—ù,‰ú,¬3.]È¥,4+,ž&C2cXmV
ä+f"Q|ûLW_
[J].ñ&øFñ,2012,20(3):354
359
[11]~üí,¬3,ýþÿ,.àjK2!<|"?ž&C2
cXI#"W_
[J].f".¸,2010,53(9):10151021
[12]$),~(´.C2cX8ÊuLDañ&DI¦“R¯
[J].X0ü. ¯,2007,22(1):78
[13]Þ%,Â:.ˆK]?C2cX_öJ6`™øÐeJ

[J].ž&.¸,1999,41(12):13321338
[14]«².ÆT/-ÑÒ].]ûËÌ~ï
[D].ò`:ÆÇ®÷à.,2014:6
[15]ˆ‰Š.]÷-.ÌÍÖ³[M].„À:8¸®÷qÁÂ,
1998:4248,207211
[16]‰&,ŠX¬,­®Ã,.=>?@‹ŒÕž#§R]4ÆÇ
›>ñ&"J{
[J].0„ž&.¸,2011,31(5):9551002
[17]FalsterDS,WartonDI,WrightIJ.SMATR:Standardised
MajorAxisTests& Routines.Version1.0.(2005920).
2003.http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR
[18]WartonDI,WrightIJ,FalsterDS,犲狋犪犾.Bivariatelinefit
tingmethodsforalometry[J].BiologicalReviews,2006,81:
259291
[19]FalsterDS,WartonDI,WrightIJ.SMATR:Standardised
MajorAxisTests& Routines.Version2.0.(20071010).
2006.http://www.bio.mq.edu.au/ecology/SMATR/index.
html
[20]3ï,­n(,Â4š,.ÑÒ[\]4U¡`™A2à4¶
K

2IRûñ·
[J].ñò. ¯,2013,32(2):241246
[21])´,§¯(,–üu,.Bñ¥qE¶ú:4E‹Œñ–
*+=Hñj2ñ2€›HI
[J].x&.¸,2002,28(3):
351354
[22]Ž·Ì,µg¸,‰©,.„Àr@š2ò2Wo•`2.H
ÝQ|ñ5ñòHñ
[J].ñò.¸,2000,20(1):5360
[23]CoyleDR,ColemanMD.Forestproductionresponsestoirri
gationandfertilizationarenotexplainedbyshiftsinalocation
[J].ForestEcologyandManagement,2005,208(1/3),137
152
[24]CoyleDR,ColemanM D,AubreyDP.Aboveandbelow
groundbiomassaccumulation,production,anddistributionof
sweetgumandloblolypinegrownwithirrigationandfertiliza
tion[J].CanadianJournalofForestResearch,2008,38(6),
13351348
[25]ì/ˆ.‹ŒQW´µ]íï2Iñ&"J{:Rûñ·J
K
[J].ž&ñò.¸,2013,37(9):811819
[26]ReichPB,ElsworthDS,WaltersMB,犲狋犪犾.Generalityof
leaftraitsrelationships:Atestacrosssixbiomes[J].Ecology,
1999,80(6):19551969
[27]VilarR,MerinoJ.Comparisonofleafconstructioncostsin
woodyspecieswithdifferingleaflifespansincontrastingeco
systems[J].NewPhytologist,2001,151(1):213226
[28]30Â.].]ûY]K2óôñ=<·#;eÓ*Ivî
ñÖ­
[J].ž&ñò.¸,2014,38(5):440451
[29]AguiarMR,ParueloJM,SalaOE,犲狋犪犾.Ecosystemrespon
sestochangesinplantfunctionaltypecomposition:Anexam
plefromthePatagoniansteppe[J].Journalofvegetationsci
ence,1996,7(3):381390
[30]WrightIJ,GroomPK,LamontBB,犲狋犪犾.Leaftraitsrela
tionshipsinAustralianplantspecies[J].FunctionalPlantBi
ology,2004,31(5):551558
[31]çp‚.‹ŒxÿUhnIWž&2ñ=hRûñ··ù"
óôbI—R
[J].ž&ñò.¸,2011,35(7):687698
[32]èé.‚©r‹ŒWbê$ë2ñ=Rûñ··ù"’;É
ùI—[J].ñò.¸,2013,33(13):39073915
[33]NinemetsU,PortsmuthA,TenaD,犲狋犪犾.Doweunderesti
matetheimportanceofleafsizeinplanteconomics?Dispropor
tionalscalingofsupportcostswithinthespectrumofleafphys
iognomy[J].AnnalsofBotany,2007,100(2):283303
[34]3&Å.½LО&4ïà4<4ïñ&"J{Q2Ž
º)>æIÕÖ

Rûñ·JK
[J].ž&ñò.¸,2008,32
(5):11751183

%&( , -)
284