全 文 ：@f@tB% 2W2, 19 (1):30- 38
Chinese BdI.& of Botmry
Advances in Physiology and Ecology Studies on Stored
Non-Structure Carbohydrates in Plants
PAN Qing-Min I-IAN Xing-Guo BAT Yong-Fei YANG Jing-Cheng
(labamtory of Quonthtite Vegetation Eodogy , Institule of h y , % Ckbme A+ ofscienca, Beijing 100093 )
Abstract Non-structural carbohydrates are important substances involved in plant life processes.
S u c m not only is the main form of translocating carbohydrates, but also can regulate the
metabolism in plant cells at the level of gene expmsion. Fructan is the main fom of carbohydrates
temporarily stored in vegetative organs, while starch is one of the main substances long-term stored
in plants. To a p t extent, the metabolisms of non-structure carbohydrates affect the plant gmwth,
development, and response to environmental factors. Here we summarize the advances in physiology
and ecology studies on stored non-structure carbohydrates in plants, concentrating upon the physio-
logical pmesses of sucrose, fructan, and starch and their responding mechanisms to environmental
factors such as temperature and water and human factors.
Key words Non-structural carbohydrate, Physiology and ecology, Sucrose, Fructan , Starch
~m@~&E@%&%~m%E%E%%%%%%%mit%%~##(~ona~h~ and Fulk-
erson,1998;Cairns et d,1999). &#&#%/J\%(Triticm aestivum L.)$Eg%&E!%,%$!?
EmErKlk$-%&EU%%%%&,fiH%%%m$-&%%RX$THeFf @ S E W &
?iE#B~r;iJ(~iihbauch et al , 1989). %%g%%&%i%E%!~7?%!E&-, &G&S&#
% H E @ ~ ~ + E F @ f & % ~ I L & % E . % @ k % S # ~ R B B t B k
@Bk%nAB%%m&EWX$9;%mnAE(Koch, 1996;Van den Ende et al , 1999;Loewe et
aZ,2000)0 ~XSBfi%~E%~BEGQ7Kk+%R%.%%%@%%lt%~&E%&
% @ % % E o
R%BS%#&E@7kk$-%3Um&ZB&,&g@7JCk$-%BEm%&&-.
z % , B * B g m % @ s ! 4 ,R%@U&8B%&7KYkX$%B&mR%~@%f7%@
(Gibson,2000;Koch et d,2000) , e B % % & E E B i 3 @ P tBBE#H E%gBJJ-E?@I%@
(&ljXz%, 1 9 8 9 ; S m g % , 1989;Lm-m et a l , 1999). $ Leloir $!I Cardini(1955)B/J\%EP
2BR%@@$-&@(EC 2.4.1.14,SFS)U%,%%#&%ER%it%#aff%?iT4Bk%
KO -BM%,%%%fsB$+R%$-&%%RMY@BTR%TR%%@$-&E
2.1.26)!3~FJ#H(Champigny, 1995; Ho, 1996). & % % # & R % m $ ? R & # R S R %
%@+B@/R%-~-@@E$~(SB/SUC-~-P~~)%%, fi SS &#$&%%A%%&q @JR%
P;$R%R~~@@%@#(UDPG)&$-&%%%@7Kk+%.
jh%,#T%%23$!~RHR33@JBT H Z % ~ Z ! J I J & ~ &%%(spirzucia okracea L.)
f t l k s ( ~ o r d e m dgare L.)k,w%%$-g%b?J@$%@U%%? SFS h?l%$%%(~ight-activa-
tion)mQ%R%m$-&(Neuhaus et al , 1990). fiiik!Z( @cine m L. )W%Pb!JR%$?R
23lMfi%%*mE@BT(feedb&ck regulation)(~ufty et d,1983). ~$$?R%lYJ6@%
A , # T R % l t B f l T H%E&BJE%37KY,3&Z%%%TR%@@+BEX$%H3H
&B%&ZE#L%JWJ@%~ 5-?&Ai11%BB%&%%k, R%%@$?&E!fi%W@%!@
& ~ ~ T ~ ~ B ~ f f - ~ ( P o l l o c k and Housley, 1985; Stitt et a1 ,1988; Huber et al ,1989) ; %% i%
HR2B%B3X$R%@@$?&@%BHBTEB2EE Q ~ % f l i B % % B ~ , &ZE
b E Q H q % % @ k i 3 @ . f %stJRH%@+&mBI!8%Ai+TAEQa#@@k-mi@$%
%,&T%k&mR%@@$-&m&mE%!@&i+Tfi%% ( ~ u b e r and Huber, 1996;
Echeverria et d,1997). ~~,"~~~@@kBTE%%"$fi@~~@(D~~glm et d ,
~ w ) , @ @ ~ M B S R ~ @ B ~ E ( D ~ ~ ~ et al , 1996)%%flT@k&I~BJT%%o #?BE%
-f?&X$SiI!i&&BEIT$r-lB~(~onro~ et al,1998).%%(Foyer et al , 1998).zk%&Ebi!3
(Garcia et d , i ~ ) m ~ G ~ % ! ~ R f i 3 a F % . IE!E%~%~TIKJ~E#l%~,kL~T@ML
~ Z ~ % ~ % O
%%%ERQS$BZt€t%(Hendry and Wallace,1993)jM1B%&$l@~%B%fH%
(Pollock and Caim,1991)%7kk+BmSZE@B$,*T&+Xrl%J%M%E&EiFRB&
Wm%B&EuB6%H&P:fm%&Q~Gs%#FBo % % % m + & 5 i % @ & % 3 3
+@h!Jfi@, - ~ ~ # : ~ % % # ~ % ~ ~ ( S u c r o s e : S u c r o s e fiuctosyl transfemse,EC 2.4.1.
99, ST);=~%%%:%%#%@B%%@(Fmctan:Fructan fmctosyl transferase,EC 2.4.1.
lOO,FFT);-E%%#Bb7k@E(Fiuctan exo-hydrolase,EC 3.2.1.26, FEH)(Archbold,l940;
Cairns et al , 1999; LUscher et d ,2000; Vergauwen et a1 ,2000)
%RBWfifiNHfi%Z%Xil-%%#+&HH%QSW,R%S%ESm+&H%
-+Z%#(Caims et d,1988,Housley et al,1989) ,&?ZI&B!&BE!@%k@ldbi@$#w~
k$%?5JTTi?E%(Chatterton et al,1988). BBtB$?+%%@b99&3&$1R+ Edelman 8
Jefford(l%6)@* l8"Precursor-Ploduct"%%, titP%%%g$E$?#%mgEb.k , B + @ @ k R %
%%@R%%E%E4$. &f.$E%@%4T7;NRIzkWXmaatR%,qUB%R%Msele
& , R % f F % % % M e & B S % m + M # E % @ ~ J ~ - $ H T ~ ? E X ( W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ and Wiemken,
1987). S T UR%%tl$-2#,*%#k%%@+&M%-$EG ,-&&%&E(DP)% 3
~ Z R # , F F T FEH m z m S a % % m f i M , f i % n a m z
%B%%,-&%@-+%%%H,BBJ#17;-+RMIffT0
#T@%%%%4tBm*B*&*H%,B%*HI#%E%Bs*%%%H%fi
l%J Pollock Caims % ~ L ~ , ~ ~ l l $ 20 I&%!80 ~ ~ ~ U 3 k X $ % ( L o l i u m p e r e n u e L. 1%
%%it#BR%%%B%m#%.t&ftT%Bm@%. l&&,%iifl% wager %(1983;1987)a
k%k, tLiF1llFfm Van den Ende %(1999)$E%iE( Cichorium intybus L. )kQ#&Tk33H3X0
~ n + m l R m % k O &@
m ~ + , - ~ ~ % z 2 ~ m ~ ~ ~ R % % % % ; ? Z ~ z G ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~ + % % # B % %
@,E*k%%zwE@%%,Is_gB%@Es+%%+?ZsTB%R%kf R % # , f i
S%%BYSm%BaBaT%qmfin(Borrell et al,1989; Kuhbauch et al , 1989)0 %
+wm+,%%%mR%z%Ba~%N~~%fi,m%%#m%@%B%&@~B*E
r3;jH%~~R%MRBR~H-%(Pollock and Jones, 1979 ;~c~ra th , 1988). %@@% q,
%%%R#MST%k%B%&O & , % @ ~ @ + & G % % % % ( P O ~ -
lock and Caim,1991)~ 2 )WZ%%%69RBo kBlfF%iFR%@&%WZbt~%%%$-f 1
f.Sfi@@$8(Pollock and Jones, 1979) ,fH@B%Wg%%%R%mgX?ZTUTH+%
~,@@~~~%BX~~-~%+&@B%@%%#R%~%UB;BBR!%@~~%R#W%S%
!8%1+7;mjE%R%. B5t&%i$%tNUt&%2 Archbold %@$ mB%, BP%%#mR%
G%%~~Z(BJ3n%,;m-BB%E%J\@H+EM$13pJ%)S@EE@$u(@J3n@$nW
TKiR\%elFfW,CQ %E%)Rt&@?5J@%o Housley %(1985)i%H%%% ,&FJ@%l+f;
~$%%f R#WZI%%,q%#@7Kk+BmJE~BGR7;Gm 72 h hR@%$n,Ek@R
g @ ; b n m n ~ ~ ~ R ~ , - ~ w W g m ~ N s e ~ % @ u B ~ ~ ~ f m z ~ @ z ~ ~ ~ .
%%@%%tB%+@7kk+81YJ2i!&f RJiAfZZH 60% - 70% ,TfiiH%% 60%@~@7kk+
~ g R ~ ~ , m R ~ m $ - ~ ~ ~ ~ n 1 1 ~ w ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ B * L Z ~ T ~rchboid % i w m
B%o 3)I f f&a$?%R%4tBo %@iFR6%m@%**&8%Bm@7kkeB%R
(S1nith,1973)~ %%%mw#Rg%%#lFf,Za&~mW~m~%$FJUR%~~%B
% 5% % ( Housley and Volence ,1988 ; Spollen and Nelson, 1988 ). Schnyder $U Nelson ( 1989) 68
%23"N.ft-+ESB%%%ES@Ts7BE$.tl:,fiH8HBEm%%Zo &3%SjFR@%N
WgBMB%Tis7.ft-&fHR&E$tf,@+48$r$P%G4+EE%&B%MWRWB% 24
h mi+E~@,%Zm%%%@@$aa$R%kmBm+ ,3-t%@+BBm%%%%E
3rCTiBBH%k+ ,33~scJB@E!f3@GRTitBltt;5B%mk~J\(Pollock and Cairns,
1991), %&Et%%%%@%B$%% 6 rng*g-FW*h-, %%d$:M&#W).t-%%#@J
#@!%B$(5 r n g ~ g - ~ ~ h ~ l ) + . f t - @ ~ ( ~ o u s l e y and Pollock,1985). Pollock %(1986)t%l@f
%-lh%%%%me&~u@&$%BiBER&Bf88$2Ia7E%m%B@B9,N&&mfi
EBT@7k.tl:e%EA5IZMBS%mF$nltiJ;8&Sa7@& 6 %%k&Ei%FJ&?%Z,iHB
B%#F4Ftnltt;,Z€EE%(~ea mays L. )$UB%(Sorghwn vulgare Pers. )lYJ.ft-!ktlR&!$%?@rl
63J%R%i99GGo qN&%&fd$Y+%R%@!%mBXt%l&BSXZ+S5BMo
, G 8 % , B E c, 8%%
R%%E%(Pollock and Cairn.~,l991)~ Chatterton q(1989)&m+%Ei.%m@$J%iqT,
H 185 H@i%tSJ%%#E%34iT#@H%,23"N G &%+SBTFJK94kl%mfiES
H(Danthonia Lam. et ~ c ) . H - % E ( s t i ~ L.) .%ESE(Oryzopsi .s M i c h x . ) $ U F % E
(T;ragmites Trin. )B!J@$@i%%E%%%%$t!Jo Srnouter %I Simpson (1989)b!J68%&3!?%
R%RitgtGH \H\*#&~k~&#@!t%o @B&+%lt,$rnH \Hrn8%2l3lSB%
#i t i , fM tL$tH%5@%&PFC ,%@116M&%EB FBE$US.tl:%@mEW ,@fkk-f+%it
3jk$qfl&*&X$9;%m$mDrtiJE&%Jo
3 3HMRjSf;f
%%B%%%EmEBEG%E,&BS%mI&E&o Z-l-+13968%%N ,3Ii$S
aE&&$@%M4tiH&42@Bfi%PBS&P%mI$E#E9MB$kRq4im
(~iil ler and Kossmann, 1994), i&-BAscl%B@I9iTgH%E Bit?E@T%%4j$&Hn
+#BBm%lBB%HBm%F&k(Preiss and Sivak, 19%) , M F L ~ ~ u @ T A ! I ~ X $ % ~ R ~ ~ ~
b%AiH0 B%X3%%itgiMH%&W%+8H+%Ho -3i%%13+&%42~ G&%
B&%#m&&%i3&WB8%#,iH$~@W%#+~~?o 8%#BWS#B%MB
6 m + O m % B @ E R # E ( t n R & ! \ R H \ H s ) + ,G%R7z
%+k#E(tUWj+)+o W%#BE%##@%&&%@H$-B9R6M23rCGT:W%
B~e&B%K%%t%l ~-@@SB%(F~P).~-@@@@#(G~P).~-%@@@%(G~P)~~B
T%+#H@EEe&mB@E@(W)mS-$%.tl:,FLiS%#+mk%R@Z%%%
TRR!YJl%Bo Keeling %( 1988)$llaj%@,fB@iBWX$~J\SH%8%#hB%Q&S4i
T%&H%O ~+R%e&m(ss)&W#kE%m.ft-~,R%=@@m@%E@@kR
(uridine diphosphate glucose pyrophospheralase , UDPGPPase) &%#kg& Gl P, Sfiigg=@$ @
% f @ % @ @ k @ ( adenosine diphosphate glucose pyrophospheralase , ADPGPPase) & 32 # k $2
#e%sfis$%@%mi%#@%=@@@@%(ADPGm%&o N @ B % # $ & R ( % ) Q k
- % ~ % @ # ~ @ 9 J 6 % % 9 l %"(G1c(,,))kO %%-f?&@i%FJBt%@#!d-f+&B(Soluble
s m h ~ynthase,%)jFR@%@%$-&%%-f?&~(~ranule-bound starch synthase,GBSS). fjiS%
&%#k+&3@8%,E8fl3&%#k$-&Z@@%(~en~er et al, 1995; SchatTer and
Petreikov, 1997). ffiiB. GBSS %&@%%%&-aSftl &#%m UE7f-!%?S#k#8] (Evers
+ m a w .xsn?\, %46 .S&%&&Z%N%Z%eE@%FutlSt@,.sTZ@@S%&%
+&fiHBB?l a-1,6 %8@ ,MfiE&%3b9%%(Preiss, 1988; Weegels et al, 19%) ,a
3bM#8]YIl%MB%E@+.@T-++B%, %%%b9$-&@1%"$2#9H.l I Y B ~ U et
al, 19%).
XTB%RBH%HtJ-+%,&kX$@%~&m#X@m%i3(~artin and Smith,
1995;ScMer and ~etreikov, 1997). @@ €I m@@%%%,@%=@@%fffj%E%@kE,
@%~&EN%ZEB@%J@%&&@3+#@E(~chaffer and Petreikov, 1997). @%=I
%E%%%E%@k@&iT5BBW%BEB%B+$PGEBo $E@IWA-+EW%&
BT,@ 3-@@giTh@&%T@@%th@@stF;ri@%Jo 3-%@?3%I@%-4th%E@ bL@RJLY
&$4g%B(~re iss , 1988;Martin and Smith, 1995). Etf%$? 9, @ 8 1 @ @ % % % % % @
kEW 3-@EH%I@#%th@@mtJT#HalS/J\T#%(~eber et al, 1995). EB4.k
m~DPGm$-&?l%@~%E%%%%+&frtJ%-~X@tJTfi&. $&iiE@*%sff$3
+zm:l)%%#mH%,@8=@@%%BE%@kE@%m%%#@%*BaB%%
(Smith et d, 1989). 2)%&lf@@f@!@f%,$E~%$!!(~olanum tuberosum L. )+$$A@%:
@@%%%E@@k.tt:bEXXH,B%1BAFZ~@#%l,$2%plf &%%(Muller-
Rober et al, 1994). 3)%!kH?l@%%!%l%hk,&@l$( ~icotiana tabacum L..).4&%.%%
(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. )+ ,X$Xth@E@%J#H;;f;&&m%Bfi@m~%=%@%
%%%%@kB@m&lf %&,%@@%E%@fl~(Stark et al, 1992). SiJ%B@%$-&@
(SSS)$EB%JEB%$%Z%+&3fiWR3 t k % 8 ~ @ @ % % % E ? i % @ k ~ E S E o H%
6@ SSS @ ? % ~ ~ i % & ~ ( C h l a m y d o m o l t a s reinhardii)%%#%%&&Bjti@f&(~ontaine,
1993) ,fi~~mm%BX$a~&%&$rt,~;k"~nockdown"W&(~eeling et al, 1993). BP
BBBi3 ;t 2 5 , FI@%#B~%I&. - m i % @ % + & G # H g C E ~ % " ~ n ~ c k d ~ ~ n " 3%
(Jenner et al, 1993). % % % % $ - & @ % $ - & ~ ( G B S S ) ~ @ % ~ ~ % % % 5 ) 9 & m # @ ~ % #
&f-%%#m@f%. ZI&$!!%$# uqf&W GBSS %#,@$-S@@%(~ovenkarnpher-
melink et al, 1987),2#%2#@AR%%! u q f & H , , X % ~ T 8 % @ % # $ - & ( ~ a n Der
Leij et al, 1987). %%@m#HZ%k&a3@%%M%3%jPfJ(Smith et al, 1995),Sf:
iiEB&S%%TX$%3ER%#m@%(T&da et al, 1993). %%KIA#T@%4t%ik
B&&H%mH%,&%%+&/J\S,3%.%%B%8fi%k ,#Tg E%%@%RHM
H%H$O
@7kkeBR#E@%%%!k$@4tB?lE&-, iT&4$%(1989)N a7$3%(1989)
@&%&%%!8ER@E&8@7kk+I%f@2kB#&@#;f;RS4$@%*%@S
fi~wammx. fi~9\+8~3fim1fi2%s+a@7~~e13~m9fix$a~
R7-k%stJDAEth@Jk(~eon~ a d Housley,1990;Loewe et al, 2000). @7kT?,eI%B%$k~$
f&BlFJ~fihk, l2 ~audet %#H%i%B?Z!2fko #f11 $ 20 80 qft87f%?X$fl~@kjL
B@fl%%P&&%B5)-SH#%fl%@X$F%#SG&%J%6H%,i&4n%%~@@
7 k f i ~ % M k f EEB&/J\%%@#%NSF&%@f3EZWF%5)-S%EB9. 927@7k
fie % .$ f X$7k 9 5)- @I J$ & % @ 8 % ( Volaire and Gondoin ,1996 ; Schellenbaurn et al ,
1999), 7k9WB;;f;R%~@7kfi.ft-%5)-9EihJH%~fiR#@mk~J\(~uick et a l , 1992;
Garcia et al,19!37) ,@%fTFl&%7;@%HfiA@\f 7;i%,iHsil%Tfk@7kk&%M.$f @all,
&#NU%&BBMBBB,%&#X$G5)-%E%%@&&%B@5)-@&flR#~&5)-
%a~(Quick et a l , 1992) ; @ E , % S ( Phaseolus vulgwis L. )$5!?3%%7k%l!!bif!7;Ek#%@
&&@%I!+H%fi, MB$U@H5)-&&B$i%1%EkH~B%@BR#H@B(Vassey
and Sharkey,1989). NJL75Ht3%@7kfi+?%.$f $kX$7k9l&if!M@J@Ni%JE7f;H
199, @%%%11%% ME%%@7kk$-%i2HX$fiB\;fb%S%Ai4%5!?3%%%iWisilB
%@7k1k~%$7BM@R ,5iX&TNBI!+@7kfie%@%%@HBBBT#H ,ESZ
MEHN~~~~F~?%W@I!+@~~~~&%B%%&@S%M~$%%B(S~W~ et a l , 1999;
Gibs0n,2000)~ "%E3+77MB% Hfjil&Hk_t:E!&%%%+93&M-+%,&o E!SE%
8Y,WB1B@7kfi&%+%@%\%%\R%\N#%&BHR%H%NRBE%%E
(Koch, 1996 ; Gibson, 2000)
#FA%B%X$%%@7kk&%R#~%nfi ,F3iSAMH%$%+;kXII%Z%&%%fiP
@7Jck$-%;f;f M # % k o 20 50- 60 +1"2,A4rl@&BFIJ%@%1J%IJ%5)-@&
B&h%i&k$lSNi&TjEW% M@7kfie%7kY%@%%(Davies7 1965). iHE,%J%@@
%kk&%$.f ?@fi%%l]%Z!6E%M#% H%AH%%E $ 20 90 ~ i ~ ~ ~ 5 ) - ( ~ o u s l e ~
et al,1991;Fulkerson and ~ l a c k , 1 9 9 4 ) , % ~ ~ ; b ~ ~ ~ j ~ % ( D o n a g h ~ and Fulkerson71998). &
+,@&fie%+MD;$i#,R%\Ek%\fi%&B%%%,B%&B%%#,@H~.$f %
%l]&?t%B 5)- #% E! %% @z ( Housley et a1 ,1991 ; Donaghy and Fulkerson, 1998 ; Vanderklein
and Reich,1999). Fulkerson@ Slack(1994)@@7k%%@7kfie%&jEW%\@E@V%q
%Bm%kB%VkB5)-#%B% T%A$J%S+&%s@x1J%IJm%&%$5N&B%
$50 B7%-&%(1994)X$% El &@&RBfiPE%@@7kke%*B$fiX$%1J@J 5)-@IGiB%T
T@i$. 1BE&gI@$EfiB%%EBBX$&H3F%@B@7kfie%SfiH%M ,fi
%%%EBB2%T&3rn5)-H%~%X@BO
%kfiS ,~~~~AX$B%~~%@I!+E%@~~~~%M~~HE~%TTB$H%,X$R%\
% % # , @ 8 % @ 7 k k e ~ 4 2 H 5 ) - ~ $ & % P e ~ ~ ~ T ~ $ H T ~ ,%X1J 2X$T&R%2B
H K B ~ ~ ) - H % E B ~ ~ T ~ B ~ ) - % E , ~ H E # T ~ F ~ R % Q ~ J ~ . ~ ~ : ~ B . I ~ H % J ~ ; B B F ~
A%S7ZH~ltilGN~J~5BQBE,jcF%#F"#E~7B@%&REB;i%BCfi5)-#H
S%B%3FIJZB,iHB&H3k%@I!+@7kke%@%E9%E&&&%B+M#RS
%@T2-$Bi?lo
-- V mmPV3 : apld Vs Jos!=d!q JO -pun us sp~~fio,~ €661 7 w mappprUl 3 1~qa 1aquod
MI - 86 :sz q POO~ ?3~ r ~31~1~ wv a9 u! mgnwe~ ars a13@ au ~~61 I 4p"l a v -3
V6L - L8L :86 r ZUaVJ0fl 7
msaraqnl WPH JOSraqrs u! ~JTI~~"FswL q~d u! dIOd Wang Jo rn!IoqelaayL .%I 3 V -lp!Cl f qaP3
LZZ - €22 :SII R*W Vd -dm$ alerlbqd-m Pw
asmpul(s aqdsoyd-asarons uaafiiaq uoq8!- us IOJ oJuap!Aa agaq prre p!sXqd ~661 d zap03 3 !Y~ME 8paAaqq
PLP - LW :66I md w uogonpsuea-@!s q a~kv -alendd~ouaoqdsoqd aq $ w![~aru a!
3 - ~s :b mqd .sohqm 8ad &ndolamp u! spqur(s qm JO 1wm atp 01 adma
9u1qawq pw pue asslkoqdsoqdau(d ascnn++qdsoqdp,s sups JO mognqyuw au =I K v qys f -J )I ~akq
SOP - 66E IdYd mN .wJ %3,,, %UIMOnO~ mwd sWFl naV F
JO WWl-3 9q-q 1 .7 wlsualnural-107 Pas!axa u! s!saVJdw!q maNJ 8861 f 3 VIPd I V SUIJ83
6ES - LZS :E9 108 V dm WtM PP-F 8
u! =N- mais JO asn pa m~!=Jap aq pus musur Xrp JO -9wd -6861 I A *a I H U-s a 1 nw x v n-08
ZSC - 6H :98 IT9
lprels l~d Jo ssa&!q atp mh PF 8: T&I~ 4 dd@ mmJ 9661 A -f d-H W S TBB
612 - 581 :a W ma^ fiaya 8 suopeikimuau aq u! =nmiam~ MI Y H PIWW
Huber S C, Huber J L, 1996. Role and +on of su-phosphate gmhme in higher plnnts. Ann Ra, Plant &mid Plant M d
Bid, 47: 431 -444
J m e r C F. Siwek K, Hawker J S, 1993. The syn- o i ["Clstcach hn [4Clmcnme in isolated wheat p i n s is dependent upon
the activity of soluble starch s y n b . Aust Jd of Plant Phyaid, a: 329 - 335
Jeang B R, H d e y T L, 1990. Fmctan mtablian in wheat in ahmating warm and add hqmahma. Plant m i d , 93: XI2 -
906
Keeling P L, Bacon P J, Holt D C. 1993. Elevated temperatun reduces starch depoeitim in wheat d c q m m by reducing the d v i t y
of soluble starch s y n b . Plants, W: 342-351
Keeling P L, Wood J R, Tyson R H, Bridges I G, 1988. Starch bioaynkaia in developing wheat grain. Plant Physiol, 87: 311 -
319
KochKE, 1996. C n ~ b o h y d n t e n ~ d u l n t e d ~ e ~ o n i n p l a n t s . AnnRa,PlantF%ysoilandPlantMdBio, 47: 509-540
Koeh K E, Yi Z, Wu Y, A v i p W T, 2000. Multiple paths of sugar-sensing and a sugar/caygen overlap for genes of sucmse and
ethanol metabolism. Jownol of ,&+nmd Botany, 51 : 417 - 427
KUhbauch W, Thorn U. 1989. Nonstructural carbohydrates of wheat stem as i n t l u d by sink-mume manipulation. J Plnnt mi-
d, W: 243-250
Leloir LF, Crndini CE, 1955. ?he biodynthesis of sucmse phosphate. I Bid h, 214: 157 - 165
Loewe A, Einig W, Shi L, Dizengremel P, Hampp R, 2000. M y d z a formation and elevated C@ both increase the capacity for
sucmsesynthesisinsouroeleavesofspruceandaspen. NewPhyd , 145: 65-574
IJJIUI J E, Furbank R T, 1999. Su- bioqnthesis in C plants. New Phytd, 143: 221 - 237
L?scher M, Hochshaaser U, boller T, W i d e n A, 2000. Isolation of mcmse : summe 1-fn~c~ltranaferaae (I-SST) hn barley
(H& dgare) . New Phytd, 145: 225 -232
Martin C, Smith A M , 1995. Starch biosynthesis. Plant cell, 7: 971 - 985
McGrath D, 1988. Seasonal variation in the water soluble cahhydrates of perennial and Italian ryegrass under cutting amdition.
J ~ g r i c h, n: 131 - 139
Monroy A F, Sangwen V, Dbindsa R S , 1998. Low temperature signal tramduction during add accwmhion : pmtein phosphatase 2A
as an early target for wld-inactivation. Plant Jd, 13: 653 - 660 ,
MullerRobex B, Smewald U, Willmitzer L. 1994. Inhibition of the ADP-glucose pymphoqhylase in transgenic pmos leads to
sugar-storing tubers and iduences tuber storage protein genes. EMBO J, 11: 1229 - 1233
N b H E, Quick W P, Siegl G, Stitt M, 1990. Control of photcaynthate partitioning in spinach leaves: Analysis of the interaction
between f e e d f o d and feedback regulation o f sucmse synthesis. Plants, 181: 583 - 592
Pollock C J , and Cairns A J, 1991. Fmctan metabolism in gresses and cereals. AM Rew Plant Phpid Plant M d Bid, 42: 77 - 101
Pollock C J, and Jones T, 1979. Seasod patterns of kc tan metabolism in forage grasses. New Phytd, 83: 9 - 15
Pollock C J, 1986. Fmctans and the metabolism of s u m in vascular plants. New Ph*, 104 : 1 - 24
Pollock C J , Housley T L, 1985. Light-induced inmeme in sucmse phosphate gmthase activity in leaves of Ldiwn temuhum. A m
OfBaony, 55: 593 -5%
h i s s J, 1988. Bioaynthesis of starch and its regulation. In: h i s s J eds. Ihe Biochemistry of Plants, Vol3. New York: Academic
Press, 371 - 378
h i s s J, Sivak M, 19%. Starch synthesis in sinks and souxces. In: Zamski E, Scheffer AA eds. Photoassimilate Distrhtion in
Plants and Gops. New Yo&: Dekker, 63 -94
@ck W P, Chaves M M, wendler R, David M, 1992. Ihe effect of water stress on carbn metabolism in fau: species
grown under field conditions. Plant Cell Md Emhun&, 15: 25 - 35
Rufty T W, K m P S, Huber S C, 1983. Characterization of d i d changes in activities of enymes involved in sucmse biosynthesis.
P h Phpid, 73: 428 - 433
ScMer AA, Petreikov M, 1997. Sucrose-testarch metabolism tomato h i t undergoing hansient starch accumulation. Plant Phpid,
113: 739 - 746
Schellenbaum L, S p ~ n g e ~ N, Schtiepp H. W i d e n A, Boller T, 1999. Effects of dm&t, hamgenic exp&on of a 6nctan syn-
thesizing enzyme and of m y c o ~ symbiosis on growth and soluble &hydrate pools in tobacco plants. New Phytd, 142: 6
7-77
Schnyder H, Nelson CJ, 1989. Gmwh rates and assimilate partitioning in the elongation zone of tall fescue leaf blades at high and low
irradiance. Plonr Phpid, 90: 1201 - 12%
S h m J, Zhou L, Jang J-C, 1999. Sugar as signaling molecules. Curr Opin Plant Bid, 2: 1001 - 1W8
Smith D, 1973. Ihe nonstructural cahhydmte. In: Butler GW, Bailey RW eds. The Biochemistry of Hehage. New York : Aca-
demic 2, 105 - 155
Smith A M, Bettey M, Bedford I D, 1989. Evidence that the rblocus alters the starch content of developing pea embryo dmugh an ef-
fect on ADP-glucose wrophosphorylase. Plant Phpid, 89: 1279 - 1284
Smith A M, Denyer K, Matin C R, 1995. What conhols the armunt and structure of starch in store organ. Plant m i d , 95: 673
-680
Smouter H, Simpson R J, 1989. ocamence of fmctans in the Gramineae (Poaceae) . New Phytol, 111: 359 - 368
Spollen W G, Nelson C J, 1988. Characteridon of hc tan from mature leaf blades and elongation pmes of developing leaf blades of
wheat, tall fescue, and timothy. Plant Physid, 88: 1349 - 1353
Stark D M, T i K P, Barry G F, 1992. Regulat~on of the amount of starch in plant tissue by ADP-glucose pymphosphorylase.
Scienoe, 258: 287 -291
Stin M, Wilke I, Feil R, Heldt H W, 1988. Coarse control of sucmse-phosphate synthase in leaves: alterations of the kinetic pmper-
ties in response to the rate of photosynthesis and the d a t i o n of sucrose. Plants, 174: 217 - 230
Takeda Y, Guan H P, h i s s J, 1993. Branching of amy1ce.e by the branching isoenzymes of maize endosperm. co.rbh* Rer,
240: 253 - 561
Van den Ende W, Rmver J D, Laere A V, 1999. EfFect of nitrogen concentration on hc tan metabolizing enzymes in young chicory
plants (Cidioriwn&$w). PhrJld P h , 105: 2 - 8
Van Der Leij F R, Visser R G F, Oosthven K, 1987. Complementation of the arnylosdre starch mutant of the potato. h r Appl
Genet, 75: 217-223
Vanderklein D W, Reich P B. 1999. ?he effect of defoliation intensity and history on photosynthesis, p w t h , and carbon r e s e ~ e s of
two conilers with contrasting leaf lifespans and growth habits. New Phytol, 144: 121 - 132
Vassey T L, Shakey T D, 1989. Mild water shess of Phm& urlgnric plants leads to reduced starch synthesis and exhactable su-
crose phosphate s y n k activity. PIaru Phpid, 89: 1066 - 1070
Vergauwen R, Van den W e W, Laere A V, 2000. ?he mle of hc tan in flowering of Campan& rapunculoides. J Ejrp Botany, 51 :
1261 - 1266
Volaire F, Gandoin J M, 19%. Tne d e c t of age of the sward on the relationship between water-soluble carbohydrate d i m
and dmught survival in two conhasted populations of cocksfoot ( Dadyh glamemhz L) . Gmrs and Fomge science, 51 : 190 - 198
Wagner W, Wiemken A, 1987. Enymology of hc tan synthesis in grasses. P h Physiol, 85: 706 - 710
Wagner W, Keller F, Wiemkm A. 1983. Fmctan metabolism in c d s : Induction in leaves and oompaamentation in protoplasts and
vacuoles. Zek&$ fur -dogie, 112 : 359 - 372
Weber H, Heim U, Borisjuk L, Wobus U, 1995. Cell-type MIC, coordinate q & o n of two ADP-glucose pymphosphorylase
genes in dation to starch biosynthesis dunng seed development of CPrcia foba L. Plants, 195: 352 - 361
Weegels P I, Pijpekamp A M, Van de Graveland A, 19%. Depolymerisation and repolymerisation of wheat glutenin during macrop-
olymer content and quality parameters. J Cereal Sei, 23: 103 - 114
Ssks N M, 1978. The p d m of salt marsh algae by controlled liquid nitmgen hxzhg. Crpbidogy, 15: 563 - 568
Scottez C, Chevmau E, Godard N, b d Y, Duron M, DeRuddre J, 1992. Cryop-ation ddd-acclimated shoot t i p of pear
in v i m culhues after encapsulat ion-dwon. Crpbidogy, 29: 691 - 700
St+ P L, 1996. Advances in Low-Tempembe Biology, Vo1.3. Greenwich. Connecticut: JAI h, 323
Taylor R, Fletcher R L, 1999a. Gyop-ation of e&ryotic *a review of methodologies. J Appl Phpd, 10: 481 - 501
Taylor R, Fletcher R L, 1999b. A simple method for the h p - a t i o n of m q o r e ~ of the green maem@ ,Y r&mqh imesti-
nalis. J A p p l P h y c d , 11: 257-262
T m S , 1973. Pmmvatimdrmnineand~algaebymewsoffreezingandfreeze-dqing. Cryobidogy, 10: 445-452
van dm Meer J P. S i F 1, 1984. Cypmendm of Gmcihiu tikLafriae (Rhoclophyta) and other macmphytic h e algae.
P K y d q i a , 23: 195-202
V i T, Arbeult S. Kass R, 1997. of p&o$ytes of Laminaria digitota (L) Iamoumux by m w e d de-
hydrntim. +Leaen, 18: 93-98