---

作 者 ：郭宁,邢韶华,姬文元,崔国发*,泽郎根,汪明,薛樵,蒋先敏

期 刊 ：生态学报 2010年 30卷 14期 页码：3784~3791

关键词：森林资源；质量评价；黄金分割；层次分析法；

Keywords:forest resources, quality evaluation, golden section, analytic hierarchy process,

摘 要 ：为明确每一森林小班内森林资源的质量状况，以便为林场采取合理的森林经营措施提供科学依据。以森林小班调查内容为基础，借鉴前人的研究成果，结合专家咨询，构建了一套森林资源质量状况的评价指标体系，并提出了简便易行、贴近生产实践的森林资源质量状况评价方法。评价指标体系由森林的自然性、森林生产力的维持能力和森林群落的结构完整性与稳定性3个方面构成，包括林分起源、龄组、林分密度等15个评价指标。采用层次分析法、专家咨询法确定各评价指标的权重值，并引入黄金分割理论，结合专家意见、相关标准规范划分了各评价指标的评价级别及其得分。整个林场森林资源质量状况等级根据森林小班评价结果的加权得出。以川西林业局管辖的301林场和303林场为例进行了评价试用，结果表明：301林场的一级质量小班数比例为45.65%，森林资源质量状况评价得分为0.59，评价级别为二级（一般）；303林场的一级质量小班数比例为6480%，森林资源质量状况评价得分为0.63，评价级别为一级（好）。结合有关研究成果和研究区域的实际情况，认为评价结果能较客观地反映森林资源质量的真实状况，评价方法具有较强的实用性。探讨了本方法在森林资源质量状况评价研究中的优缺点。

Abstract:In order to define the forest resources quality of each subcompartment, and provide scientific basis for the forest farm to take reasonable forest management measures, an indicator system of forest resources quality evaluation was built in this study which based on the subcompartment investigations, previous research results and expert advices, also, the easy used evaluation method with the attributes of easy use and close to the production practice was put forwarded. This indicator system was composed of three aspects, the naturality of forest, the maintenance ability of forest productivity, and the integrity and stability of forest community structure, which included 15 evaluation indicators, such as the origin of stand, the age group, and the stand density. Analytic hierarchy process and experts consultation method were used to define the weight value of each indicator, and the Golden Section theory was also introduced, combined with the expert advice and related standards, the evaluation level and score of each indicator was defined. The status and classes of forest resources quality in the whole forest farm was evaluated based on the results of each subcompartment. In this study, the No.301 and No. 303 forest farm in the Western Sichuan Forestry Bureau were used as a case study. The results indicated that the ratio of the first class subcompartments in the NO.301 forest farm was 45.65%, and the second and the third class subcompartments was 53.52% and 0.83% respectively, the score of forest resources quality was 0.59 which ranked as the second class, classified as general; in the NO.303 forest farm, the ratio of the first, the second and the third class subcompartments was 64.80%, 32.35% and 285% respectively, and the score of forest resources quality was 0.63 which ranked as the first class, defined as good. According to the related research and the actual situation of the studied area, this evaluation method can objectively reflect the real situation of forest resources quality, and it also suitable to be used in other forest regions. At last, the advantages and disadvantages of this evaluation method were discussed.

---