免费文献传递   相关文献

Effects of Actinomycetes on the Growth and Antioxidative Characteristics of Perennial Ryegrass under Drought Stress

放线菌对干旱胁迫下黑麦草生长及抗氧化特性的影响



全 文 :书!"#$%&
,2016,36(4):0751-0756
犃犮狋犪犅狅狋.犅狅狉犲犪犾.犗犮犮犻犱犲狀狋.犛犻狀.
  !"#$:10004025(2016)04075106               犱狅犻:10.7606/j.issn.10004025.2016.04.0751
%&(
:20151229;)*&%+(:20160226
,-./

()*+%,-./01
(41230314);23%456789:;<=01(IRT0811);789./>?@AB!CDEF
5GHIJKL6MNO,-
(310829151146)
0123

PQR
(1984-),S,TUVWXYG,Z[\]F^_`abXY。Email:shumiaocao@163.com
cde4:fg+,7h,VWGij,Z[\]klFg5GHmnopqXY。Email:wenkew@chd.edu.cn
456789:;<=>?@AB
CDEFGHIJ
!"#
1,
$%&
1,
$ 2,( )1
(12rs% klFg5GHmn789./>?@,!r710054;2tuKLs% v%w,!r710054)
K L:xyz{|}~€G$>?,XY‚kƒF„…EO†z‡ˆ‰ŠG2A‹ŒŽq‘。’“
”•
:(1)‚k–—E,^ ˜6|}O†z”™š›ˆ‰ŠqG2,œ6žŸ~9G$ ž¡”™¢£35.00%
A37.47%;(2)|}O†z¤,ˆ‰Š¥¦q¥§¨© Aª«¬­¨® ž¡”™¢£12.02%A10.38%;
(3)£z¤3}Z[q‹Œ¯°Œ$±¯(SOD)、²Œ$¯(POD)A²Œ³¯(CAT)´ µ£z‡¶·
¢£

œ¢¸ž¡¹12.72%、2.38%A24.83%,œ6SODACATqº¢£”™。XY»¼,‚k–—EO†
z|}^˜¤

½¾ˆ‰Š¥§¨® Aª«¬­¨® 

¢¿ˆ‰Š‹‚k–—q‹Œ¯º

À”™š
›ˆ‰ŠqG2

¢£œG$ 

MNO

‚k–—

O†z

ˆ‰Š

‹Œ
PQRS$
:Q945.79 !TUVW:A
犈犳犳犲犮狋狊狅犳犃犮狋犻狀狅犿狔犮犲狋犲狊狅狀狋犺犲犌狉狅狑狋犺犪狀犱犃狀狋犻狅狓犻犱犪狋犻狏犲
犆犺犪狉犪犮狋犲狉犻狊狋犻犮狊狅犳犘犲狉犲狀狀犻犪犾犚狔犲犵狉犪狊狊狌狀犱犲狉犇狉狅狌犵犺狋犛狋狉犲狊狊
CAOShumiao1,WANGWenke1,WANGFei2,ZHANGJun1
(1KeyLaboratoryofSubsurfaceHydrologyandEcologicalEffectsinAridRegion(MinistryofEducation),Chang’anUniversity,
Xi’an710054,China;2ColegeofScience,AirForceEngineeringUniversity,Xi’an710054,China)
犃犫狊狋狉犪犮狋:Weinvestigatedtheeffectsofactinomycetesonthegrowthandantioxidativecharacteristicsofpe
rennialryegrassunderdroughtstress,usingsoilinoculatingactinomycetesagentandpotexperiment.Re
sultsshowedthat:(1)actinomycetesinoculatedtreatmentsignificantlypromotedtheplantgrowthunder
droughtstress,ofwhichroottilernumberandrootfreshweightweresignificantlyincreasedby35.00%
and37.47%,respectively(犘<0.05);(2)thecontentsoftotalchlorophylsandcarotenoidweresignificantly
increasedby12.02%and10.38% withactinomycetesinoculatedunderdroughtstress;(3)thethreemain
antioxidativeenzymeactivitiesofSOD,PODandCATwereincreasedby12.72%,2.38%and24.83%,re
spectively,whileSODandCATactivitiesshowedsignificantlyincreasedwithactinomycetesinoculation.
Theseresultsindicatedthatactinomycetesinoculatedindroughtsoilimprovedthecontentsoftotalchloro
phylsandcarotenoid,enhancedtheantioxidativecharacteristicsofperennialryegrass,andthussignificant
lypromotedtheplantgrowthbyincreasingplantbiomass.
犓犲狔狑狅狉犱狊:droughtstress;actinomycetes;perennialryegrass;antioxidativecharacteristics
  ÁÂGˆ‰Š(犔狅犾犻狌犿狆犲狉犲狀狀犲L.)ÃÄÅÆ
ÇÈÉ}.[qÊË̊

G2Í

žŸÁ

ÎÌÏ
ÐÑÒ

ÊÓÔ#qÕÖ×}

ØÏ

ٜڠ
¾

ŠÛÖ~ÜÝÞß

àáyâãäÝå

ÃÉ}
æ´¾çèméAGHmnq#$

‚kÃêëFž–—qZ[ìÙíÉ

ÁÂG
ˆ‰Š‡Fžîïqðñ´¿

‹k´ò
[1]。
‚k–—À󈉊q¥§ô’õö÷,øAùú
ûüýþ

¦ÿ!"ž#$%&

(.)*ˆ
‰Šq+,ey

‘+,-¨q® A./
[23]。
ØÏ

#$0‚k–—¤

ÀÚGs q12

›3
i4ôȲ qŒ)5,qÚG

ê6#£7ú8
²Œ

9/:;ú<=þ>

‡#$ÚG´¿q?
@ey
[4]。
ÙØ

‚k–—A|BCˆ‰ŠqG
268A×Û

DÂE

ÈÏ%4Z[FGˆ‰ŠHk×
}qIJ

KyL,ÙAžMNOqPQE½¾×
}q‹k
[57]。
*3

5âRS

TUs~Vvo
pqWX

YîZ[É}IJ\Ö]^â>_ny
q`aob
[8]。
#$G2_šGz
(plantgrowth
promotingrhizobacteria,PGPR)ùc¹ÃÉ}de
æfgqhG$

Àžiš›#$G2qajÚ$
klm1n

op¨q$ۚ›#$G2

Àš›^
˜Ýžqº

æKâ#$rs^˜#st6qÉ
uvîw¨k N、P、Fe、Znq;ØÏxÀÚG‹G
¨q$ÛE)*^˜6qyìz

”™š›#$G
2

½¾#$Ú A×Û
[9]。
z{XY6

KyÈG
|zñ`ˆ‰ŠÀ¼”½¾œT}@~–—E#
Î¥¦SODº,ss€¥¦ MDA® [10];3
‚k–—EÈG|zñ`‚æ”™½¾ƒZ#$ˆ
‰Š‹Œ¯SOD、PODAPPOqº,„óˆ‰
Š‡‚k–—q…n†¹‡ˆ
[11];
TžMF‰Š

ÈG|zñ`ˆ‰Š¤Z[c²‹ŒæF¥§ô
Ž

~‹ŒAºŒ‘’,Ù

E¢¿ˆ‰Š
qHk
[12]。
*3

1“qXYZ[”6T|zo
p

‡âO†z‡ˆ‰ŠT•‚kƒF„…EqG
2š›ey~‹ŒqXY–—

O†zÃ^˜6Z[qhG$z˜íÉ

œ6
q™pz‘ÚG‹G¨

)*^šyì|z

š›#
$G2
[13]。
O†z›H6œÀ*/ºz*{

â
ž]^âspŸ y

]‡IJ\Ö

¡XYK
y€>?

./¢£ÉÎO†z‡ˆ‰ŠT‚k
ƒF„…E‡ˆ‰ŠG2A‹Œq‘


¹O†zš›ˆ‰ŠT‚k•‚k„…EqG2A
Hk½¥+%¦§

1 ¨©Aob
1.1 X Y
1.1.1 Z[ x)B!2rlª«»ÿ30cm^
˜

¬‚

²5mm­®I,¯ °N$ó^˜±²·
É

³´œvÛ

»1)。
1.1.2 \@] O†z Act12(µ¶™pz,
犛狋狉犲狆狋狅犿狔犮犲狊狆犪犮狋狌犿)¹!"ª·+¸s%¹ºI
J%whG$¹ºXY@

\»¼¾ì

½^¾ì^
˜¾¿GJEqÀÁÎO†z6žÂIJÃq1Î
ÁđzÎ

ÅzÆæÇyšGÁ}đ
[13]。
¡X
Y€È?ÉyzʹÅzq›H6œÚ$

œ6
ºzË ¹4.6×1010CFU·g-1[14]。
ˆ‰Š}MÌâ"ÍΪުϸÐXYÉ

Ñø.2.2g,öR¸90%,T}#“y0.5% Na
ClO@}E&?10min,yÒÓFÔÕ。
1.2 ^_`a
1.2.1 bc È?և¶A£z×v,ØÙ×v.
b9Ú,Û18。€^qFžÜÝÞß6s9
ž•‚kDl^˜®F¸qàá
(10%~30%)[15]。
1.2.2 de Ø(Aâ23cm,ãü21cm)ä^
3kg。£z×vå1.5g·kg-1‚^qy æz{
5^˜±²¤

äçè©

}#“é^˜êëF
ž

ó^˜®F¸ì*T30%,/í,·²žî,Ø
}50ø;}#¤c²ï.bØðñòêëóðþ
qFž

}Mô6/õRSöR

óØ=ɍ÷
15Î。æ€øùOúTû+}@,}üì*T
22℃,Øü5~6dó^˜®F¸ý¹10%,#$Ø
Sö÷6½#‚þ¥¦

ÿêëFž1Ú!30%,
"#$¤‚k–—
,30d¤s%,Ð&(G2


1.3 f][gh.iUjk
1.3.1 f] #$*+y¯ÂMFÕ‚,,yr
l1 Zm,noEGp
Table1 Thebasicphysicochemicalpropertiesofsoil
-.Index       g Value
pH 6.77±0.35
©/ TotalN/(g·kg-1) 1.27±0.10
©0 TotalP/(g·kg-1) 0.49±0.01
©1 TotalK/(g·kg-1) 0.24±0.01
æùÛ Organicmatter/(g·kg-1) 14.57±0.95
2.Bulkdensity/(g·kg-1) 1.21±0.02
®F¸ Watercontent/% 20.56±1.23
257 ! " # $ % &                   363
F4r‚#λpq5ÂF

³´ˆ‰ŠÎ¾

žŸ
Ë

6Î¥¦Ë

7E<ï.

89:¥. 

ï
.’;¤

÷<;*q¥¦=žâ>/6

³´²Œ
³¯

°Œ$±¯A²Œ$¯qº~¥
§¨® 

1.3.2 qrstu ;*#$¥¦,?Ղ,,¯
¥@

<2.0g£— ABCA95%1DXE/²
F

£1D²G!H-2 I
,´
2Ã25mL,TJ
2¹660、649A470nmE³´r+ü,§Licht
enhaler[16]KL89。
1.3.3 犛犗犇vwG 5)*/MNO(NBT)T+
EqxìeyEP´

Q¶ Marklund[17]qob,É
Ù¯º6Rz)*NBT+xìq50%»•。
1.3.4 xDEyvwG §³ 240nmEr
+¸qàˆüE…S²Œ³ž%

obQ¶
Aebi[18],z1minÈT—0.1q¯ ¹1Ù¯
º6R

1.3.5 xDE]vwG å¶Pole[19]ob³´。
1.4 ZmP456犃犮狋12Hzujk
O†z£ç‚k–—^˜6

‡#$G2UZ
[qÝlA»^6|çO†zqVåË 


l^˜-<µ”žîl5Ç

»^-<ŠXYqs ^Z[¤»p]Xqy^zFÕEq— ^˜

l

»^+
×*_Q¶$`¿q
[20]
qob›a

xybc‰d
b›ahG$žÂ8Ë

c²5efg݉dŠ|
çqO†z Act12Qhz[iH,h´j´Pc
Act12qË [21]。
1.5 z{|o}R~
k‡¢¸

lctrl%)û•|z×v5µ|z
‡¶qmg5µ|z‡¶hgqnžË

³´+×
q˧žoy=8žoyp…SPSS20.0(IBM,
USA),mq”™yDUNCANbr?,žoT犘
<0.05F‰(»•mqs”™F‰)›a。
2 ’“5žo
2.1 89:;<4567=>?H@AIJ
»2”•,‚k–—E,^ ˜6|çO†z¤,
ˆ‰Š2

žŸË~*.”™¾âµ£z‡

(犘<0.05),ž¡¢£16.11%、35.00%~
37.47%;3ξ、¥¦Ë~*.q£z×vt”
™ ¾ â µ £ z × v

ž ¡ ¢ £  28.83%、
32.14%~28.45%。’“»¼,T‚k–—E,O
†z£ç^˜¤‘”™š›ˆ‰ŠDE9žADŠ
9žqG2

œ6‡žŸ~9G$ q¢£U
¼”

2.2 89:;<4567=>?€stuH
IJ
u1”•,T‚k–—E,5µ£z‡¶kh,
£z×vˆ‰Š¥¦qª«¬­¨® A¥§¨©
 ž¡¢£10.38%A12.02%,œ¢£·s”™
F‰
(犘<0.05)。Àv,T‚kƒF„…E,O†
z£ç^˜¤

š›ˆ‰Šq¥§¨® ¢£

u1 ‚k–—EO†z‡ˆ‰Š
¥¦+,-¨® q‘
Fig.1 Effectofactinomycetesonthecontentof
photosyntheticpigmentsinperennialryegrass
leavesunderdroughtstress
l2 89:;<4567=>?@AHIJ
Table2 Effectofactinomycetesonthegrowthofperennialryegrassunderdroughtstress
×v
Treatment
2
Rootlength/cm
žŸË
Tilernumber
perplant
*.
Freshrootweight
perpot/g
ξ
Plantheight/cm
¥¦Ë
Leafnumber
perplant
DŠ*.
Freshshoot
weightperpot/g
‡¶ Control 5.4±0.2 2.0±0.1 16.2±0.95 16.3±1.1 5.6±0.5 16.17±1.01
£zInoculation 6.27±0.15 2.7±0.1 22.27±1.76 21.0±1.4 7.4±0.6 20.77±1.60
lctrl% 16.11 35 37.47 28.83 32.14 28.45
  G:»•|zg´‡¶gmqs”™F‰(犘<0.05);Ee。
Note:denotessignificantdifferencebetweenactinomycetesinoculationanduninoculatedcontrolat0.05level;Thesameasbelow.
3574¤           PQR,q:O†z‡‚k–—Eˆ‰ŠG2~‹ŒŽq‘
wÀ‘5O†zš›ˆ‰Š
Ÿ¢s

x%Fž–—‡ˆ‰Šq–—æF

2.3 89:;<4567=>?q‚CDvHIJ
#$‹Œ¯<=Âk–—EŽ#$ôy
0ºŒqŒþ>q.[Ž<=

z{°Œ
$±¯
(SOD)、²Œ$¯(POD)A²Œ³¯
(CAT)q。SODÃ#$Ç|Œ)5,‡:;þ>
q}É~dž

Z[æ溏Aæ?q°Œ)5
,L/ H2O2 AO2。^˜6£çO†z,ˆ‰Š
¥¦qSODº´µ£z‡¶”™¢£12.72%

u2),w»¼O†z£ç½¾SODº,óˆ
‰Š‡‚k–—ÚGqŒ)5,L¹ H2O2 q 
¢£

ø¤
,H2O2 ÀùCATAPODL¹ H2O
AO2 3。^˜£çO†z¤,ˆ‰Š¥¦q
CATº´‡¶”™¢£24.83%(u2),3
POD¯º‚æ”™¢£,àµs。w»¼,‚
u2 ‚k–—EO†z‡ˆ‰Š¥¦
‹Œ¯SOD、CATAPODºq‘
Fig.2 Effectofactinomycetesontheantioxidant
enzymeactivitiesofSOD,CATandPODin
perennialryegrassleavesunderdroughtstress
u3 O†zT‚k–—^˜6qVå
Fig.3 Thecolonizationofactinomycetes
inthesoilunderdroughtstress
k–—E

O†z£ç^˜¤

Z[c²½¾ˆ‰Š
ôÈqSODACATqº,eeyÇ|ºŒ
)5,q>@

2.4 456ƒ89:;|oZmPH„…
ϺzT#$€q´å’Á´z{6‚m
“q.[Ù¨íÉ

¡XY6

O†z Act12£ç
‚k–—Eˆ‰Š}#^˜
,30d¤³´’“(u
3)»¼,ÅO†z‘T‚k–—^˜6/Ä´å,T
l

»^6q´åË ž¡¹3.98×107、6.35
×107CFU·g-1。
3 ƒ „
#$G2ÜÝ5|çzT#$9q´å‘’
æA|F<

XY6÷

…†‡:z
(犅狌狉犽犺狅犾犱犲狉犻犪
狆犺狔狋狅犳犻狉犿犪狀狊)PsJN ‘T‚k–—EÕÖ´åT
ˆ‰q9
[22]。
¡XY6O†zÃ\¾¿‚k„
…EžÂ3E

Ææ‰M s

‹Š¿

æKâ´
åqÑ/

‚k–—E

ÅzTˆ‰Š9‘‹Õ
ÖVå

ڛˆ‰ŠG2A‹Œ¯ºq.[
$Û,Œ

æXY»¼ˆ‰Š0‚k–—

Ž0Gv-
.6Gà

Z[»÷TG20Ã)*

G$ T
ˆ

!þq÷‘
[13]。
¡XY6O†zAct12T
‚k–—E‡ˆ‰ŠqG2Æ攙qš›ey

’œ‡ˆ‰Šqš›eyUs

wZ[ÃÙ¹h
G$À‘ÚG#$šG$Ûk#$“¨

lm1n

IAA)、”,I•–—n˜”¯(ACCdeaminase)、
™:;qEš“#$G2

x%‚k–—
。IAA‘
‹š›#$9»pŸA„Ëq¢£

¢£9
‡FžAݞqrs

›3›#$n‡ƒFI
J
[23]。
ØÏ

‚k–—Àó#$ÚGs q12

_šGzÚG ACC˜”¯,‘ž%,/12q
“ô$Û

€12qŸœ

›3Àx%#$0‚k
–—q@

š›#$G2
[24]。
hG$ڙ:;

‘‹¢£æmH™ÂM® 

š›#$9rsq
G2
[25]。
ØÏ

hG$x‘c²Ún

$0ey

¢
£æm0q® 

š›#$G2
[26]。
3O†zTV
åS

xÀ‘žÚGk‹G¨

æùn

”,n

ŸG
¨
、¯
qajÚ$

ž Üqz¡ô‘‹ÚGŽ};
ÏF%¯
[13],
wu$Û¡¢Àš“#$<68~
ݞrs

¡XY6O†zAct12T‚k–—E‡
ˆ‰ŠqšGeyÀ‘5Åz‘ÚG£}#Á}š
G$ÛæF

z{qXY6KyO†zAct12‡Á
}¤¥e$k!¦

Š§
、¨
¦qt»÷öÕÖqš
457 ! " # $ % &                   363
Gm“
[14,27],
©‚æ‚k–—EKyÅO†zš›
ˆ‰ŠG2A‹kqXY&~

¡XY›Éfª
>ÅO†zÀ‘žÃà«qšGz

n›Éf¢
£œT‚k–—EqšGùv

¥§¨Ã#$¥§ôÈQ5+,eyq.[-
¨

¥§¨® qÁ—5œG$,/~¬€%æ
F

À…SFž–—E#$+,AG2ÜÝq-.
íÉ
[28]。
¡XY6÷

‚k–—E

O†z‘”™
¢£¥§¨© Aª«¬­¨® 

hG$TG2
aj²L6c²ÚGšG$ÛAº^˜Ýžš›
#$‡^˜ÝžAFžqrs

x%Œ–—þ>

)*+,-¨qž%~+,‘’

”™¢£+,-
¨q® 
[28]。
3ª«¬­¨c²d+%­®R
¯²°q‘ 

Ž¥§¨žMy±Œþ>
[29]。
¥§¨® Aª«¬­¨q¢£

›Éfª¼O†
z£ç^˜¤µ„‡#$G2暛ey

‡B²
ºŒqþ>ë.[qey

ƒF#‚k–—‘ýI#$q+,A³r
,´
à:;µeq“¨F‰

i4ºŒqs œ
Ÿ
[30]。
‚k–—‡ˆ‰ŠqU¶>@Z[Ãêë
¥¦˜F

·¸

¥¦F(.›3i49‚þ

#ΐ¹
[31]。
ÙØ

¥¦6‹Œ¯
(POD、SOD、
CAT)‡Ÿº)5,Tˆ‰ŠôÈÚGAq»
H‰¼de.[
。SODÀzæ溏Aæ?q
°Œ)5,L/ H2O2,ø¤ H2O2 ÀùCATA
PODL¹ H2OAO2 3[30]。¡XY6^˜
£çO†z Act12¤,ˆ‰Š¥¦‹Œ¯CAT
APODqº”™½¾,‡‚k–—Eˆ‰ŠëÃ
Ÿ¾qŽey

3PODºqàµs。hG$
qey€‚k–—‡#$q?@ey
[32]。

æXY»¼½¾|}¿‰Àzx%‚k–—ÁE
q>@

©‹Œ¯CATA²Œ$¯ºÂ€

[33]。
¡XY6O†z Act12µ„‘x%‚k
–—‡#$G2q@

x‘óÃ}‹Œ¯CAT
ASODºT´¾qºF‰。
ĊÉÅ

‚k–—E

O†zAct12£ç^˜
6

c²¢£¥¦¥§¨® Aª«¬­¨® 

½
¾#$¥¦6‹Œ¯qº

x%ˆ‰Š0‚k
–—q>@

›3”™½¾ˆ‰Š9ADŠ9
žqG2

†‡!T

[1] ÆVB.ÁÂGˆ‰ŠqŠJGvXY›Ç[J].G$%NÈ,
2010,27(2):5861.
   MABY.Researchadvancesinstressphysiologicaladaptation
ofperennialryegrass[J].犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犅犻狅犾狅犵狔,2010,27(2):58
61.
[2] ÀÉ¿,A`Ê,Ëé·,q.¾}‚k–—E3ÙÁÂGˆ‰
Š×}¥§ôA†øô°h’õqà
[J].ŠÏ%&,2009,
18(1):2531.
   WANLQ,SHIYH,LIXL,犲狋犪犾.Thevariationofultrami
crostructureinchloroplastandmitochondriaofthreeperennial
ryegrassunderhightemperatureanddroughtstress[J].犃犮狋犪
犘狉犪狋狌犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犲犛犻狀犻犮犪,2009,18(1):2531.
[3] CHAVESMM,FLEXASJ,PINHEIROC.Photosynthesisun
derdroughtandsaltstress:regulationmechanismsfromwhole
planttocel[J].犃狀狀犪犾狊狅犳犅狅狋犪狀狔,2009,103(4):551560.
[4] GILLSS,TUTEJAN.Reactiveoxygenspeciesandantioxi
dantmachineryinabioticstresstoleranceincropplants[J].
犘犾犪狀狋犘犺狔狊犻狅犾狅犵狔犪狀犱犅犻狅犮犺犲犿犻狊狋狉狔,2010,48(12):909930.
[5] A`Ê,ÀÉ¿,ÌÔÍ,q.‚k–—‡6ÙÓyÁÂGˆ‰
Š×}‹kq‘
[J].ŠD%&,2009,17(1):5257.
   SHIYH,WANLQ,LIUJN,犲狋犪犾.EffectsofPEGstresson
thedroughtresistanceofsixturfgrassvarietiesof犔狅犾犻狌犿狆犲
狉犲狀狀犲L.[J].犃犮狋犪犃犵狉犲狊狋犻犪犛犻狀犻犮犪,2009,17(1):5257.
[6] LIUS,JIANGY.Identificationofdiferentialyexpressedgenesun
derdroughtstressinperennialryegrass[J].犘犺狔狊犻狅犾狅犵犻犪犘犾犪狀狋犪狉狌犿,
2010,139(4):375387.
[7] HANL,LIX,LIUJ,犲狋犪犾.Droughttoleranttransgenicperen
nialryegrass(犔狅犾犻狌犿狆犲狉犲狀狀犲L.)obtainedviaparticlebom
bardmentgenetransformationof犆犅犉3/犇犚犈犅1犃gene[J].
犃犮狋犪犎狅狉狋犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犪犲,2008,783:273282.
[8] ASHRAF M,AKRAM N A.Improvingsalinitytoleranceof
plantsthroughconventionalbreedingandgeneticengineering:
ananalyticalcomparison[J].犅犻狅狋犲犮犺狀狅犾狅犵狔犃犱狏犪狀犮犲狊,2009,27
(6):744752.
[9] CHAUHANH,BAGYARAJDJ,SELVAKUMARG,犲狋犪犾.
Novelplantgrowthpromotingrhizobacteriaprospectsandpo
tential[J].犃狆狆犾犻犲犱犛狅犻犾犈犮狅犾狅犵狔,2015,95:3853.
[10] ÎÄÏ,¾½Ð,Ñ Ò,q.Fž–—EÈG|zñ`‡ˆ
‰Š¥ÈŽ¯<=º’q‘
[J].ny5IJG$%&,
2001,7(4):348354.
   CHENSP,GAOYB,LIANGY,犲狋犪犾.Effectofendophyte
infectiononprotectiveenzymeactivitiesinleavesof犔狅犾犻狌犿
狆犲狉犲狀狀犲L.underwaterstress[J].犆犺犻狀.犑.犃狆狆犾.犈狀狏犻狉狅狀犅犻
狅犾.,2001,7(4):348354.
[11] ÓrÔ,¾½Ð,Î Õ.‚k–—EÈG|zñ`‡ˆ‰Š
¥ÈÖ}eK¯q‘
[J].GH%&,2004,24(7):1
3231329.
   RENAZ,GAOYB,CHENY.Effectofendophyteinfection
onPOD,SODandPPOenzymesinperennialryegrass(犔狅犾犻狌犿
5574¤           PQR,q:O†z‡‚k–—Eˆ‰ŠG2~‹ŒŽq‘
狆犲狉犲狀狀犲L.)underdifferentwaterconditions[J].犃犮狋犪犈犮狅
犾狅犵犻犮犪犛犻狀犻犮犪,2004,24(7):13231329.
[12] ZHOU Y.Neotyphodiumloliendophyteimprovesdrought
toleranceinperennialryegrass(犔狅犾犻狌犿狆犲狉犲狀狀犲L.)through
broadlyadjustingitsmetabolism[D].NewZealand:Massey
University,2014.
[13] ZHAOJ,XUEQH,SHENGH,犲狋犪犾.Evaluationof犛狋狉犲狆狋狅
犿狔犮犲狊spp.forbiocontrolofgummystemblight(Didymel
labryoniae)andgrowthpromotionof犆狌犮狌犿犻狊犿犲犾狅L.[J].
犅犻狅犮狅狀狋狉狅犾犛犮犻.犜犲犮犺狀.,2012,22:2337.
[14] ×ØÙ,Ú Û,ÜÒÝ,q.É}ÞßàyGÇ*{~œG
Úob

6
,1543801A[P].20041110.
[15] LIMX,MAZG.Soilmoisturedroughtdetectionandmulti
temporalvariabilityacrossChina[J].犛犮犻犲狀犮犲犆犺犻狀犪犈犪狉狋犺
犛犮犻犲狀犮犲狊,2015,58(10):17981813.
[16] LICHTENHALER K.Chlorophylsandcarotenoids:pig
mentsofphotosyntheticbiomembranes[M]//PACKERL,
DOUCER.MethodsinEnzymology.SanDiego:Academia
Press,1987:350382.
[17] MARKLUNDS,MARKLUNDG.Involvementofthesuper
oxideanionradicalintheautooxidationofpyrogalolanda
convenientassayforsuperoxidedismutase[J].犈狌狉.犑.犅犻狅
犮犺犲犿.,1947,47:469474.
[18] AEBIHE.Catalase[M]//BERGMEYERH U.Methodsof
Enzymatic Analysis.Verlag Chemie:Weinheim,1983:
273286.
[19] POLLEA,OTTERT,SEIFERTF.Apoplasticperoxidases
andlignificationinneedlesofNorwayspruce(犘犻犮犲犪犪犫犻犲狊L.)
[J].犘犾犪狀狋犘犺狔狊犻狅犾狅犵狔,1994,106(1):5360.
[20] $`¿,×ØÙ,á â,q.GÇO†z‡!¦€hGH
q‹ãmn
[J].!"ª·+¸s%%&:)*+%ä,2008,
36(4):143150.
   ZHOUYQ,XUEQH,YANGB,犲狋犪犾.Adjustedeffectofin
oculatingwithbiocontrolactinomycesonmicrobialfloraof
watermelonrootingzone[J].犖狅狉狋犺狑犲狊狋犃牔犉犝狀犻狏.(Nat.
Sci.Edi.),2008,36(4):143150.
[21] å æ,çèÕ,é ê,q.GÇO†z{‡ë은hG
$l[J].ny5IJG$%&,2015,21(2):
221227.
   HEF,ZHANGZL,CUIM,犲狋犪犾.Effectofbiocontrolactino
mycetesagentson microfloraintherootzoneof犃犿狅狉
狆犺狅狆犺犪犾犾狌狊犽狅狀犼犪犮K.KochexN.E.Br[J].犆犺犻狀.犑.犃狆狆犾.
犈狀狏犻狉狅狀犅犻狅犾.,2015,21(2):221227.
[22] NAVEED M,HUSSAIN M B,ZAHIRZA,犲狋犪犾.Drought
stressameliorationinwheatthroughinoculationwith犅狌狉犽
犺狅犾犱犲狉犻犪狆犺狔狋狅犳犻狉犿犪狀狊strainPsJN[J].犘犾犪狀狋犌狉狅狑狋犺犚犲犵狌
犾犪狋犻狅狀,2014,73(2):121131.
[23] MANTELINS,TOURAINEB.Plantgrowthpromotingbac
teriaandnitrateavailability:impactsonrootdevelopmentand
nitrateuptake[J].犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犈狓狆犲狉犻犿犲狀狋犪犾犅狅狋犪狀狔,2004,55
(394):2734.
[24] LIMJH,KIMSD.Inductionofdroughtstressresistanceby
multifunctionalPGPR犅犪犮犻犾犾狌狊犾犻犮犺犲狀犻犳狅狉犿犻狊K11inpepper
[J].犜犺犲犘犾犪狀狋犘犪狋犺狅犾狅犵狔犑狅狌狉狀犪犾,2013,29(2):201.
[25] JINCW,LIGX,YUXH,犲狋犪犾.PlantFestatusaffectsthe
compositionofsiderophoresecretingmicrobesintherhizo
sphere[J].犃狀狀犪犾狊狅犳犅狅狋犪狀狔,2010:mcq071.
[26] NENWANIV,DOSHIP,SAHAT,犲狋犪犾.Isolationandchar
acterizationofafungalisolateforphosphatesolubilization
andplantgrowthpromotingactivity[J].犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犢犲犪狊狋
犪狀犱犉狌狀犵犪犾犚犲狊犲犪狉犮犺,2010,1(1):914.
[27] çíî,×ØÙ,ï+ð,q.O†z*{‡ñQG2~€
^˜hG$l[J].nyGH%&,2013,24(8):2
2872293.
   ZHANGHY,XUEQH,SHENGH,犲狋犪犾.Effectsofactino
mycetesagentonginsenggrowthandrhizospheresoilmicro
flora[J].犆犺犻狀犲狊犲犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犃狆狆犾犻犲犱犈犮狅犾狅犵狔,2013,24(8):
22872293.
[28] Ìoò,Æó·,ôõÒ,q.-öT2÷R‡‚k–—E|
}_šG:zqGv‘n
[J].GH%&,2015,35(21):
70037010.
   LIUFC,MAHL,DUZY,犲狋犪犾.Physiologicalresponsesof
犔狅狀犻犮犲犮犪犼犪狆狅狀犻犮犪conrainerseedingtoplantgrowrhpromo
tingrhizobactariainoculationunderdroughtstress[J].犃犮狋犪
犈犮狅犾狅犵犻犮犪犛犻狀犻犮犪,2015,35(21):70037010.
[29] K RANNERI,BECKETTRP,WORNIKS,ZORN M,
PFEIFHOFERH W.Revivalofaresurrectionplantcorre
lateswithitsantioxidantstatus[J].犘犾犪狀狋犑.,2002,31:
1324.
[30] GUPTADK,PALMAJM,CORPASFJ.Reactiveoxygen
speciesandoxidativedamageinplantsunderstress[EB/OL].
2015.http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F9783
319204215.
[31] Îøù,Ñúû,füý.ÁÂGˆ‰Š‡¾},‚kqGv
…n
[J].þͪÏs%%&,1988,11(2):8792.
   CHENCF,LIANGZD,WANGHS.Physiologicalresponc
esofperennialryegrasstohightemperatureanddrought[J].
犑狅狌狉狀犪犾狅犳犖犪狀犼犻狀犵犃犵狉犻犮狌犾狋狌狉犲犝狀犻狏犲狉狊犻狋狔,1988,11(2):
8792.
[32] VURUKONDAS,VARDHARAJULAS,SHRIVASTAVA
M,犲狋犪犾.Enhancementofdroughtstresstoleranceincropsby
plantgrowthpromotingrhizobacteria[J].犕犻犮狉狅犫犻狅犾狅犵犻犮犪犾犚犲
狊犲犪狉犮犺,2015.
[33] VARDHARAJULAS,ZULFIKARAS,GROVERM,犲狋犪犾.
Droughttolerantplantgrowth promoting 犅犪犮犻犾犾狌狊spp.,
effectongrowth,osmolytes,andantioxidantstatusofmaize
underdroughtstress[J].犑.犘犾犪狀狋犐狀狋犲狉,2011,6:114.

!"

#$%
)  
657 ! " # $ % &                   363