全 文 ：广西植物Guihaia32(6)：781—787 2012年11月
DOI：10．3969／j．issn．1000—3142．2012．06．013
pl肌tsofMarantaceaendPteridophy-
teSforplll．ificati叽off011l胁ldehydepollutedair
ZHOUJun_Huil*，YUEBao—Cha01，CHENShui_Jianl，XUHui—Lian2
(1-GDZZP胛o，Ho以if“Z￡“地n行dLn竹ds∞pPA^i￡盯￡“化，Z^o胛g胁iUhiwi砂o，Ag—f“血M即口，埘E押gi珊盯i以g，
Guangzhou510225，China；2．h抛惭口￡io抛Z卜k￡“阳凡肌i九gR酷∞r施C锄￡Pr，Nagano390一1401，Japan)
Abst强ct：Tenpla tsfromMarantaceaefarnjliesandtenplantsfromPteridophytesweret stedfortheirabilitiesofre—
movingformaldehyde(FDH)intheair．Eachoft eplantswasplacedfors即endaysina1．Om×1．Om×0．8m
91assbOxfilled谢thFDH谢thheinitialconcentrationofl5mg／m3．SomeplantssuchasN∞￡fop抛矗s竹id“sVolu—
lum，Ch￡nf^已nZ“66盯，i以，znshowedthetopresistantabilitytoFDH；someplantssuchasCnZⅡ￡^e口or撒fn，ChZ口f^阳sP一
￡om，G口缸f^∞倒dy，and(kZn￡^组ros已。一pictashowedmediumresistantabilitytoFDH；othersp ciessuchasN∞f—
fo户￡盯is挖趔“s，PfP—s知“一西，RP—s跏矗，0门竹i5cv．Victoriae，P地以sc化ficncv．Alb01ineata，NP夕^r0ZP户i5∞趔i如￡缸，
CvcZ050，Ws声n，诅s缸if“s，B￡砌，z“mo一册￡丑如，j切hr祝孢fn疣coZor，and(麓Z口￡^8盘朋6ri，硷showednoresistanctoFDH．
TheabsorptionofplantsforFDHintheglasschanlberwasfoundespeciallyapparentlydifferentduringthefirstthree
days．ThefastestpurificationratesofFDHwerefoundinspeciessuchasC．g咖i，zn，Mif，．050，—“mp“竹c￡n￡“，，andthe
slowestwerefoundinspeciessuchasC．抛ras饿c“5，P．研si厂0门扔scv．victoriae，N．行id“scv．Volulum，andC．sP￡osn．
Inconclusion，8speciesofthepottedplantswhichouldberecommendabletobeused{orFDHpurificationwereN．
前列“s，C口如￡^∞rof“行di如￡缸，P．c邝fimcv．Albolineata，C．orm衄，P肠fyfP—Mm6i k彻 “m，N．九id“scv．Volulum，
C．ros咿picta，andC．／砘ddy，becausetheplantshavehighabsorptionab订itytoFDHandhave1essdamage．
1畸words：formaldehyde；indoorpott dplants；IⅥarantaceae；Pteridophytes；purification
CLCN哪ber：Q945Doc咖tC0de：A觚iclem：1000一3142(2012)06一0781—07
竹芋科和蕨类室内盆栽植物对
甲醛净化作用的研究
周俊辉1*，岳宝超l，陈水渐1，徐会连2
(1．仲恺农业工程学院园艺园林学院，中国广东广州510225；2．日本国际自然农法研究中心，日本长野390一1401)
摘 要：以竹芋科和蕨类室内盆栽植物各10种为试验材料，分别置于体积为1．om×1．om×o．8m密封玻璃
箱内，甲醛起始浓度均设置为15mg／m3，连续观察7d。结果表明：卷叶巢蕨(N∞￡fo户￡Pris扎id“scv．Volulum)、矩
叶肖竹芋(巳胁矗阳z舶ersi彻口)对甲醛抗性最强(I级)；银线竹芋(C．o砌衄)、银羽斑竹芋(C．卵￡os口)、翠叶竹芋
(C厂形d勿)和彩虹竹芋(C．roseo_picta)抗性较强(Ⅱ级)；巢蕨(N．起id甜s)、傅氏凤尾蕨(P￡P矗s如“r蒯)、银脉凤尾蕨
(P．鲫s2厂o”iscv．Victoriae)、银心大叶凤尾蕨(P．c肥￡imcv Albolineata)、肾蕨(NP加roze户is∞趔i如z施)、华南毛
蕨(C∞zosoⅢs加阳s越f“s)、乌毛蕨(Bze如咒“优or塘n缸如)、花叶竹芋(Marn挖细抚∞幻r)和天鹅绒竹芋(C．z幻矗m)抗
性最差(Ⅳ级)。甲醛处理后，密封玻璃箱内甲醛浓度均呈递减变化，递减最快都集中在试验后1～3d之间。吸
收甲醛最快的植物是天鹅绒竹芋和星蕨(Mifrosor“优加以c抛f“m)，最慢的是华南毛蕨、银脉凤尾蕨、卷叶巢蕨和
收稿日期：2012一05一02修回日期：2012—08一07
基金项目：广州市科技和信息化局科技攻关项目(20loYl一c731)[supportedbytheKeyScienceandTechnologyProjectofTechnologyandInfomation
BureauinGuangzhou(20loYl—C731)]
作者简介：周俊辉(1963)．男，江西临川人，博士，副教授，从事园艺植物栽培生理的教学与研究工作。
”通讯作者(Authorf rcorrespondence。E—mail：junhuIzhou@163．com)
万方数据
782 广西植物 32卷
银羽斑竹芋。对甲醛处理产生伤害反应少或较少，而吸收能力强的前8种植物是：巢蕨、青苹果竹芋(C．r0地谢i一
如z缸)、银心大叶凤尾蕨、银线竹芋、二歧鹿角蕨(P肠z弘析“柳肪／k，∞f甜m)、卷叶巢蕨、彩虹竹芋和翠叶竹芋，可作
为甲醛净化专用植物应用推广。
关键词：甲醛；盆栽植物；竹芋科；蕨类；净化作用
IncreasingusesofresinsandsolVentssuchas
formaldehyde(FDH)inconstruct onandecoration
materialsh vecausedsevereponutionofi doorair．
FDHisakindofc010rlesschemicalwithastrongpun—
gentodor，especialyste dilyreleasingfromind00rdec—
orationmaterialsforthreetofifteenv ars．FDH1ike
otherchelllicalssucha benzenecausesserioushazards
tohumanhealthandisclassfiedasthefirstclassofhu—
mancarcinogensbyI ternationalAgencyforResearch
onCancer(IARC)becauseitis cap bleofinducing
cancersandtumors．
Interestintheindooraiquantyhasbecomean
earnesti sueinChinasincethereisa seriousDroblem
o{eXcessiveu eofFDHinhousingc。nstruction，refor—
mationandecoration．Yu&而ng(2005)monitored
morethanfiftynewdecoratedbedr。omsandfoundthat
thepollutantssucha FDH，benzeneandotherv01at订e
organiccompoundsexceededthehmitedstandardsby
36．8％，38．4％and12％，respectively．Theadoption
ofenergy。savingproposalstoreducethereIeaseofin—
doorp011utantshas1edinefficiencyinimprovementof
indoorairqualityandconsequentlymakespotential
healthhazardsemaining．Itisoneoftoday’shottest
researchsubjectshowtouseindoorplantsoabsorb
andremovetheindoorairpoIlutants．ThearIyre—
searchwascarriedoutbyW01vertonofNationalAero—
nauticsandSDaceAdministration(NASA)andthere—
searchgrouplistedthetoptenplantswhichwereeffec—
tiveinclearinga deliminatingodor，purifyingair，and
absobinga decomposingFDH，benzeneandother
pollutants(Wolverton，1997；W01verton以以Z．，1985)．
Theseplantsincludespiderplant((玩Zo9户^y￡“mco栅一
s跏)，Englishivy(He矗er口靠已paZP咒sisvar．si行e竹sis)，
A10evera，DmcnPnnm72der如咒n，D．讹rgi撇妞，D．
加g凇挖svar．A钇ss伊踅g∞咒8，mother-in-law’stongue
(Sn以s8说erin￡r ，矗sci口￡a)，S． ≠ri／hsci口f口，(二弓，‘6e，’况
Ja，”P50咒ii，Chineseevergreen(AgZ。o以卯mspp．)，peace
1ily(S户口￡^i声^了比甜，扎∥Dri6“心d“静2cv．Clevelandii)，and
Pri￡c矗n九童ingn乱dic矗口乱d娩．Recentyears，manyre—
searchersandscientistsnChinafocusedonselectionof
plantspeciesthatare ffectiveinabsorbingorrcnlo—
vingFDHfromindoorai (Li，2006；ZhouP￡口 ．，2006；
Huang以以Z．，2008；CaoP￡nZ．，2009；Xiong&Su，
2009；Wu2006)．PlantssuchasMD竹s￡g，udeZifiom，
Fic“5已缸s￡钯，(流Zorop^y￡“优∞mosⅡm，andOpuntia
strictiahaveprovedcapableofabsorbingFDHinthe
air．However，effectivespeciesarestin1imited．No—
ticeably，itiss mdifficluttoeli面nateFDH，benzene
andotherindooraipollutantsinlowconcentrations．
Thepreviousstudiesshowedthatmanypottedplants
hadmoreorIessabiIitiesofabsorbingandecomposing
FDHandbenzene．Moreover，theDo s，culturemedia
andmicro。rganismsi themediaalsoshowedabilityof
absorbingFDHtosomeextent．However，thepuri“ca—
tioneffecLsofthetestedplants，suchasC撬ZD7．o户五yf“m
co仇osM，竹andSci，2如户s“s日“，℃“卵，wereinconsistentin
differentsearches．Althoughtenspeciesoft eplants
suchasSfi咒dn夕s“sa rP甜咒，A5p口，4口gz￡ssP 口fe“s，S口咒一
sP说Pr施￡矗知sc如尬cv．Hahnii，C矗￡or0声^∥￡“m∞mD—
s“m，AgZ以。咒肋2cz∞mm“缸z“mcv．WhiteRajah，Ag肠一
。起黝∞研研征细￡“优cv．RedNarrow，Ag￡口07z硎ncom—
m“￡口￡“7，zcv．7Reubii，Sci行c如户s“s夕if￡“scv．心gyraeus，
国s据臧‘g地趔i5，丹iZ谢阴dm靠sodi煳icv．Wendimbe
wererecommendedforFDHpurification(Zhou甜日Z．，
2011)．ButthereisstillmuchworktoseekforH10re
plantsnotonlywithgoodperformancetoremoveair
pollutants，butalsowi hlessornodamagetohuman
beings．Therefore，inthepresentstudy，plantsfrom
theMarantaceaendPteridophyteswere tedfor
theirabilitiesoabsorborremoveindoorFDHand
otherpollutantsaswe¨astheresistancetoFDH，in
ordertoprovidere{erencetotheutilizationofplants
forindooraiDurification．
1 MaterialsandMethods
TwentypottedplantsfromtheMarantaceae
万方数据
6期 周俊辉等：竹芋科和蕨类室内盆栽植物对甲醛净化作用的研究 783
andPteridophyteswereusedasexperimentalmate
rials(Table1)．
Table1 Twentypottedplantsusedfrom
theMarantaceaendPteridophytes
Marantaceae Pteridophyte
(1口Zn￡^encrocn￡n B￡Pf^n“，norie竹￡口Z8
(1口Z口￡^en，rPddy C了“osor“s户n，usi￡ic“s
(麓Z以如∞Z“拍P，苫iⅡ疗n^彳ifrosorw优西“珂cf口￡“m
(k￡n￡^e口7n口忌Dy口n口 Neo￡￡opfPri5粗id“5
[kZ口￡^e口o，72n￡n NPo￡￡op￡eris超id“scv．Volulum
(1n￡nf^e口rosPo—pictaNPp^rofPpiscordi．厂0ZiⅡ
(：1口￡口￡^enro￡Mndi／bzi口Pznf了fPriMm6i．厂“rcn￡“，咒
(hZ口￡^ensP￡os口 P￡Prisf，℃fifdcv．Albolineata
(1nZn￡^en2已6rinn Pf已ris已nsi内r，”iscv．Victoriae
Mnrnn缸6icoforP船一s，矗“ri“
1．1ExperimentaItreatments
Thetestedpottedplamwasplacedinaglasscham—
berwithawallO．8mmthickandinsidevoll】meofO．8
n13(1．Om×1．0m×O．8m)．Insidethechmberplaced
asHlaUfanandathemometer．1heD obeoffom】alde—
hyde(FDH)inspector(KeEmuotradingCo．，Ltd．of
!、henzhen)、^阻sinsertedintothechanlberthmughahole
oflcmdiameter．TheholewasremovabIendfitted
witharubbergasketandclampstoprovideanairtight
seal(Wolvenon以口Z．，1985)．Theimtialconcentration
offomaldehydewasetupto15n堰·rrr3．Theexp ri—
mentaltemperaturewascontrolledat(20±1)℃．Three
treatnlents、^陀redesignedasfonowed：(1)plantpottedin
themediumwasplacedinthechamber而th15mg·瓜3
FDH；(2)thepOt谢thmediumbut谢thoutplantwas
placedinthec}lamber谢th15mg·nf3FDH；(3)the
chanlberonlyfilled埘th15mg·rrr3FDHascontr01．
1．2Measurementofchlor叩hyll
0．2gfreshdiachymawasobtainedfromthemid—
dlepartofoneleafwithoutvenationbeforetreatment
andinthe7thdayafterbeingtreatedformeasurement
ofchlorophyll，respectively．Leafchlorophyllwasex—
tractedby95％ethanol(Wang，2006)．Theconcentra—
tionofthextractedhlorophyUwasmeasuredat665
nmand649nmwave1 ngthusingaUV—Visspectro—
photometer(TU一1810Model，Generalanalysisinstru—
mentCo．，Ltd．ofBeijing)．Concemrationsofchlom—
phyUa(CA)，chlorophyUb(CB)andthetotalchloro—
phyll(C})werecalculatedusingequationsasC_一
13．7D665—5．76D649，CB一25．8D649—7．6D665，andCT
—CA+CB一6．10D665+20．04D649，where，D665and
D649weretheopticaldensity(OD)valuesofchlorophyll
at665nmand649nm，respectively．
1．3Measurementofleafce儿membraneperm abnity
Thefreshdiachymawasmeasuedforcellmem—
brane’pemeab订itybeforetreatmentandinthe7thday
afterbeingtreated，respectively．’I’hedjachymawas
rinsed3timeswithdeionizedwaterandthesurfacewa—
terwasabsorbedwithfilterpaper．Thentwenty1eaf
discseachinO．5cmdiametertakenbyh01eDuncher
wereimmersedin20mLdeionizedwaterforthree
hours．Thelectricalconductivity(EC)(recordedas
C1)ofthewateraftertheleafimmersionwasmeas—
ured．ThentheleafsamDlewasboiledfor15minand
theEC(C2)wasme uredagainafterthewaterc001ed
downtotheroomtemperaturendwasreplenishedto
20mLwithdeionizedwater(HuangP￡口Z．，1990)．The
leafcellmembranepermeability(Lc)wascalculatedas
Lc(％)一100×(C。／C2)．
1．4Othermeasurements
Thefomaldehvdeconcentrationin hechamber
wasmeasuredeVerydayafterthexperimentbegan．
Thefreshabovegroundpartakenfromtheplantwas
weighedasfreshnlass．Thenthesematerialswere
d i dinthemicrowaveovenfordrvmassdeterrnjna—
tion(YuP￡nZ．，2007)．Thedamageofthetestedplants
intheformaldehydeairwascoredfrom0to4degrees
withthehurtincreasing．
2 ResultsandAnalysis
2．1PlantresponsecausedbyfOrmaldehyde
TherankingfOrhunrespOnseofpottedplantsto
fOrmaldehyde(FDH)pollutionⅥ阻sn协deshownin ble
2accordingto(Zhou甜吐，2011)．It啪ssuggestedthat
species1ikeN．行id“s‘、厂01ulm’andCZ￡￡6沈，．sin舰
showedmoreresistantab订itytoFDHdanlageand
groupedintoGrade1．TheseplantssuchasN．前id“s，P．
知“一Pi，P．跏si如门咒毋cv．Victoriae，P．f形fi∞cv．舢bo—
lineata，N．∞刑i厂0锄，C册r口s砒“s，B．ori伽缸如，M
臃coZor，andCz已幻t，硷showedlowerresistancetofonn—
aldehyde．7rheplantsb fore(1eftintheranle)andafter
万方数据
784 广西植物 32卷
Table2 Damageresponseandgradefortwentypottedplantsaftert eatedby
FDH
S口ecies Responseofpottedplant brade
C．￡“66Prsi乜竹口 0nly8tinyspotsonleaves
1
C．or咒n缸 Only1etiolatiedIowerleafblade，morespotsonotherleaVes，mostleaVeswerenormal z
C．JPf05口 0nly2eti01atiedlowerleafblades，afewspotsonotherleaVes，mostleaVeswerenormaI z
C．rrP矗dv 0nly3eti01atied10wer1eafblades，afewspotsonotherleaVes，mostleaVeswerenormal
z
C．，-osgD—picta 0nly3entirelybrownlower1eafblades，morebrownspotsonotherleaVes，butstem1ngoodcondltlon
Z
P．6i^rcn￡“m BrowningandrottenonhalfIeaves．TheplantwouldrecoVerfromthedamage 3
C．，眦毒Dvn口 8eti01atied1eaves，denselyblackorwaterstainsspotsonsomeleaVes 0
^t声M咒f￡n￡“m Blackm01dyontopleafblades，nomalda ageonlowerstem．ThepIantwouldrecoVerfromthedamage3
C．croc口缸 4etiolatied1eaves，severewaterstainsSpotsonotherleaves．TheplantwouldrecoVerframthedamage3
C．r。￡“ndi如Zi口 5 etiolatiedleaves，manyspotsonotherleaves，butstemingoodcondition．TheplantwouldrecoVer
3
N．”涮“5
P．妇≈r崩
p．ensiformts
cv．Victoriae
fromthedamage
CompletelywaterstainsspotsandmouldonmostleaVes
Waterstainsspotsona11leaves，plantdried
Waterstainsspotsona11leaves，plantdried
P．f，曾￡icn Waterstainsonwholeplantandied 4
cv．AIbolineata
N．cordi内Zi口 Mostleavesweredropped，waterst insonwholeplantandied 4
C．声n，u5i￡如“5 Waterstainsonwholeplantandied 4
B．o“P川纽ZP Waterstainsonwholeplantandied 4
M．6icoZor Onlyfewleavesweregreen，putrescenceandsearonmostleaVes 4
￡：：!!型!兰 Q呈!：!!!型!!!!!兰!!曼坚!!：!!翌2生兰!z!!!!呈!坠墨!旦!尘!!!呈!!!!!!!!翌!———————————．!一
Table3 FDHconcentrationperday(mg·m一3)inthechamber
Dayafterbeingtreated
Species
ld 2d 3d 4d 5d 6d 7d
C．f“66Prsi∞口 13．40 12．45 3．54 1．27 O．28 0．。o 0．00
C．or竹n妞 14．09 11．56 1．94 O．36 O．07 0．04 0．01
C．5已￡05n 14．87 13．40 5．63 2．79 O．98 0．12 O．00
C．，M矗dv 14．09 6．07 1．47 O。14 O．OO O．oo O．00
C．rosPo—Dicta 14．09 7．45 2．56 0．35 O．01 O．01 0．01
P．抚^rcnfHm 13．40 4．73 1．23 O．32 O．11 O．07 O．07
C．舢女ov口n口 13．40 12．70 5．09 1．89 O．42 O．00 0．03
At声“nf￡ⅡtMm 14．09 1．11 O．23 O．05 O．00 0．Oo O．Oo
C．crocd￡n 14．74 10．32 4．62 2．99 O．j6 O．26 O．04
C．r叫“ndi内Z谊 14．87 8．78 1．94 O．36 O．04 O．00 O．01
N．id“5 14．09 8．87 4．54 1．03 O．18 O．00 O．01
P．佑““酣 13．40 7．44 4．66 2．47 1．29 O．47 O．04
P．ensi内rjwi5cv．Victoriae 14．87 7．95 6．24 4．30 2．65 1．09 O．26
P．cr酣ifncv．Albolineata 14．09 3．85 1．94 O．62 0．26 0．05 O．03
N．∞r出舳Z妇 13．40 13．40 5．15 2．23 O．12 0．12 O．05
C．由口r乜s以ifM5 14．74 12．61 7．34 3．30 2．12 O．48 O．08
B．onPn￡nZP 14．∞ 8．12 2．60 1．34 O．11 0．08 O．04
M．6i∞Zor 14．09 9．34 1．60 0．07 O．01 O．00 O．Oo
C．ze6rinn 14．74 7．29 O．07 O．04 O．04 O．04 0．04
CK 14．87 13。40 13．40 9。26 4．62 2．81 1．11
(nghtintheframe)subjectedtoFDHpollutionare
showninFig．1．Theconcentrationofformaldehydein
thechamberwasdecreasedfastinthefirstthreedays．
ThefastestpurmcationofFDHwasfoundinspecies
suchasCzP谚i，2n，M．痧“以f配￡“m，andtheslowestwas
foundinspeciessuchasC。夕＆rn5如ic“s，P。e咒si，br—
miscv．Ⅵctoriae，N．挖id甜scv．V01ulum，C．s以om，and
N．∞r以内f如(，工hble3)．
2．2AbsorptionofFDHbypottedplants
Asshownin7rable4，thetopfiveplantswhich
hadhighFDHabsorp“onperdryweightwereN．程i—
d“s，Cr0￡乱咒反内Z沈，P．c化￡ic口cv．Alb01ineata，P．抚一
以 cn￡“7挖，andCo2n￡口．Thehurtresponseofpotted
plantstoFDHpollutionwasdividedinto10scores
万方数据
Fig·lPh。‘。sofs。mep。ttedpiantsbefore(Ieftintheframe)andafter(rightintheframe)subjectedt。FDHp。lluti。n
accordingto(ZhouPfnZ．，2011)．Thescoreofthe
FDHabsorptionperdrymasswasmadeanadiust—
mentsthatwas，usedthe4thday’sconcentration
substltutedfortheseVenthday’s．Theintegrated
eValuationontheFDHpurificatione“ectfDotted
plantswashowninTable5．Thetopeightplants
forFDHpurificationeffectaccordingtotheirnte—
gratedeValuationwere1istedinTable5．N．柏id“s．
C·ro￡“di／bZin，P．fr8fif口cv．Albolineata，C．or咒n一
勉，P．6i厂“rfnf能m，N．”id“5cv．Volulum，C．，．osPo—
p cta，andC．／’厂Pddyfortheintegratedscorewas
surpass3．60respectively．
2·3Changesintotalchlorophy¨concentrationand
cellmembranepermeability
AccordingtochangesinceIlmembranepermeab订一
ity(CMP)，plantsweredividedintothreegroups．The
万方数据
竺：型：竺!：!竺芝兰而—竺竺竺≤豢=熹—————飞F两F面■嘶 鼽cie。 叽8黜辨秽“嬲
Species 嬲，。黑。，努。嚣掣)专磊五丽而-一』≮等兰—蔷r
一；———≤等等票≮誓等笋 芑’篪羔■⋯ 岩．：。，
精巧万了忑—熏—焉■砑 兽淼妇” ：渊 篇
婴№耐一n 翟。算㈦：臻鬻 Z淼 一减 hs·
呈。删a 曼914n黑鬻滞苫芳茏y 溉 叭e粤。?， 烈：燃：撼黑 Z并m 品 e．z。
呈．厂删d? 娶：! 暑；： ：。j： ：’i； ≥Z泛：荔易 j：；； e．os
c．rDs，出ta 哿‘等 鲁：： ；’：； ：‘i； 舌：黧三嚣：” ；：；； -s．sap，“⋯m 0琶燃；鞣黑 麓’裟淼 黼 ·o：s，
拿：m威。弘一 j：·：j ：j‘：： ：’；i ：。lo 答‘三：：竺“”2 j：i； s．·s
M．觚刎一 ⋯：㈤：溜黑 苫：Z簏M。 减 蚰·
!．⋯叭_ ?·雾⋯；砝滁 ≈．裟∥“” 赫 ¨。，
唧缈例n 濮∽：撼滁 ；j筹；。i 品 nae
■如： 慧÷鬻篇 篇 ；篇篙眺吼vict。ri。。 赫 z瑚z脚州“ 151．9置燃黑黑 篱嬲烈釜妄淼i。 蒜 地es
P．翼∞?“
11·48 10·57 吼31 o。03 叠葛荔葛：⋯⋯⋯⋯ o．99 14．73
万方数据
6期 周俊辉等：竹芋科和蕨类室内盆栽植物对甲醛净化作用的研究 787
thetoplants，outstandingfortheirlowhurtresponse
andhighabsorptionab lity．Wecouldnotcompareour
resultswithotherresearchers(ZhouPf口Z．，2006：Li
2006；jⅣangP￡口z．，2007；HuangP￡口z．，2008；Cao甜
口Z．，2009；Ⅺong&Su．，2009；Tian以口Z．，2011)．灿一
thoughtheytriedtogivetherankingofFDHpurifica—
tionability，thenumberoftestedpottedplantswere
bothfewandinsystelllic，ortherew resomeproblems
intheirexperimentdesigns．Forexample，theywraped
orsealedthepot，mediaandthebottomofthetested
plantswithplasticbagsorfilms(Zhou，P￡nZ．，2006；
AchkorP≠aZ．，2003；SongP￡口Z．，2007)，withoute—
noughnumberofplants，inturn，withouten ughillers
orshoots，whichcouldnotensurehighFDHabsop—
tion．Theremaybethreewaysforpottedplantstore—
actoFDHairpoUution．Thefirstwithhighabsorpa—
tionbutweakresistancetoFDHdamage，showedobvi—
oushurtmorphology，foreXample，inpla tssuchasN．
∞趔i如砌，P．如“，．概，C．加r口s娩c“sandP．e咒si如mi5
cv．Victoriae．Thesecondshowedweakabsorpation
butstrongrisistancewithnomalmorph0109ybytak—
ingavoidancestrategytoprotectitself．P1antssuchas
C．Z“6畦配，百ia，zna dC．or，z口厶口belongtothisgroup．The
thirdshowedabsorpationndtransfomingabilitywith
moreorlesshurtresponses，includedplantss chasC
ro￡“咒di／．0Zi口，C．sP￡os以，andC．，．0seorpicta．Itwasper—
plexedthatsomeplantshadhigherabsorptionab订ity
forFDH，buthadlowercenmembranepem ability，
viceversa．Thismechenismmaybeneedfurtherstudies
inf1】ture．
4 Conclusions
Inconclusion，8speciesoftheindoorp ttedplants
whichouldberecommendabletobeusedforfomal—
dehydepurificationwereN．押id“s，C．，．0￡“孢di／-0Zi口，P．
c愆￡icncv．Albolineata，CoM口纽 P．6i^枷￡甜m，N．
押id“scv．V01ulum，CrosP0_picta，andC．加ddy．
Acknowled雩舢tsTheauthorsthankMr．Yi—pin
Zhou，Ms．Wan—fengZhanga dMs．Jie—pingL ufrom
ZhongkaiUniversityofAgricultureandEngineering，
fortheirgeneroushelpandtechnicalassistance．
References：
AchkorH，DiazM，FemdndezMR，以以．2003．Enhancedfon al一
dehydedeto】(ificationbyoverexpressionof91utatHone—dependem
fomaldehydedehydrogenasefromA，_n6ido户5如[J]．Pz口，坛P^j，s—
ioZ，132(8)：2248—2255
CaosJ，PanBH，TianYC，甜“．2009．Comparisonofabilityof
absorbingformaldehydeamong6speciesofindooro mmentals
[J]．±凳ozEn机r0月Sfi，18(5)：1798—1801(Inchinese)
HuangAK，LiN，’IhngGG．2008．Capabilitytoabsorbhighcon—
centrationbenzenea dfoHnaldehydeoffourindoorpottedplants
[J]．，E”祝rD”H∞z拍，25(12)：1078—1080(InC}linese)
HuangXL，ChenRZ，ZhangBZ．1990．SeedPhysiologyLabo—
ratoryManual[M]．Be的ing：AgriculturePress：122—124(In
Chinese)
LiI锄． 2006．TheornamentalabsorbformaIdehydeinthe
roomNortheastForestryUniversity[J]．Mn5￡PrThPsis，15
—19(InChinese)
S0ngJE，KimYS，S0hnJY．2007．Astudyonreductionofv latile
organiccompoundsinsummerbyvariousplants[J]．．，s chi”
LkiuT苫c^押oZ：Nn￡SfiEd打，35(Suppl)：219～222
TianYC，PanBH，CaoSJ．2011．Researchofeightkindsofindoor
foliageplantstofomaldehydepurification[J]．Non^P埘Ho厅，
2：82—84(InChi ese)
WangYL，YangZD，DengRY，订ⅡZ．2007．Studyonresponseof
severalgardenplantsofomaldehydepollution[J]．G抛扎gzi
S以，14(2)：163—166(InChinese)
WangXQ2006．PrinciplesandTechniquesforP1antPhysiology
andBiochemicalExperiment[M]．2nded．Be幻ing：HighEduca—
tionPress：134—136(InChinese)
WolvenonBC．1997．HowtoGmwFreshAirrM]．NewYork：
PenguinB∞ks：18—19
WolvertonBC，DonaldRC，MesickHH．1985．Foliagep antsfor
theind∞rrenlovaloftheprimrycombustiongasescarbonnlon—
o妇deandnitrogeno)【ides[J]．‘，Missi5s矽piAf口ds“，30：1—8
WuP． 2006．StudyontheInd∞rPollutionAir—Fonmldehyde
PurificationAb lity而thseveralPlants[M]．NanjingForestry
U血versity，Nanjing．Masterthesis，：12—16(InChinese)
XiongY，SuZG． 2009．Aresearchontheabilityofabsorbing
fomaldehyde锄ongfivespeciesofindooro mmemals[J]．＆一
讲ro以Sci』恍口mg，34(1)：45—47(InChinese)
YuGL，7rangHY．2005．Investigationandanalysisoftheindoor
environmentofthe ewbuildinginGuangzhoucity[J]．ch打?J
HPnZ￡^Insp，15(3)：350一364(InChinese)
YuY，YangY，LiuXD，“nZ．2007．Probeontheresistanta—
bilityofplantstoformaldehyde[J]．sci丁0f^oz，n，，16：
40，59(InChinese)
ZhouJH，QinFF，SuJ，以nZ．2011．Purificationo fomaldehyde-
p011utedairbyind∞rplantsofAraceae，AgavaceaeandLili ceae
[J]．JF00dAgric&Environ，9(3，4)：1012—1018
ZhouⅪ，LiangSY，JinYJ，甜nZ．2006．Thecomparisonofability
ofabsorbingfomaldehydeamong13 speciesofind∞rormmen—
tals[J]．(玩i竹AgrifSciB“朋，22(12)：229—23l(Inchinese)
万方数据
竹芋科和蕨类室内盆栽植物对甲醛净化作用的研究
作者： 周俊辉， 岳宝超， 陈水渐， 徐会连， ZHOU Jun-Hui， YUE Bao-Chao， CHEN Shui-Jian， XU Hui-
Lian
作者单位： 周俊辉,岳宝超,陈水渐,ZHOU Jun-Hui,YUE Bao-Chao,CHEN Shui-Jian(仲恺农业工程学院园艺园林学院
,中国广东广州,510225)， 徐会连,XU Hui-Lian(日本国际自然农法研究中心,日本长野390-1401)
刊名： 广西植物
英文刊名： Guihaia
年，卷(期)： 2012,32(6)
被引用次数： 2次

参考文献(17条)
1.Aehkor H;Díaz M;Fernández MR Enhanced formaldehyde detoxification by overexpression of glutathione-dependent
formaldehyde dehydrogenase from Arabidopsis 2003(08)
2.曹受金,潘百红,田英翠,王贵武 6种观赏植物吸收甲醛能力比较研究[期刊论文]-生态环境学报 2009(5)
3.黄爱葵,李楠,汤庚国 四种室内盆栽植物对高浓度苯和甲醛的吸收特性[期刊论文]-环境与健康杂志 2008(12)
4.Huang XL;Chen RZ;Zhang BZ Seed Physiology Laboratory Manual 1990
5.Li QJ The ornamental absorb formaldehyde in the room 2006
6.Song JE;Kim YS;Sohn JY A study on reduction of volatile organic compounds in Summer by various plants
2007(Suppl)
7.Tian YC;Pan BH;Cao SJ Research of eight kinds of indoor foliage plants to formaldehyde purification (In
Chinese) 2011
8.王利英,杨振德,邓荣艳,覃寿艺 几种园林植物对甲醛污染的反应研究[期刊论文]-广西科学 2007(2)
9.Wang XQ Principles and Techniques for Plant Physiology and Biochemical Experiment 2006
10.Wolverton BC How to Grow Fresh Air 1997
11.Wolverton BC;Donald RC;Mesick HH Foliage plants for the indoor removal of the primary combustion gases carbon
monoxide and nitrogen oxides 1985
12.Wu P Study on the Indoor Pollution Air-Formaldehyde Purification Ability with Several Plants 2006
13.熊缨,苏志刚 五种常见装饰植物对甲醛的吸收能力比较研究[期刊论文]-环境科学与管理 2009(1)
14.Yu GL;Tang HY Investigation and analysis of the indoor environment of the new building in Guangzhou city (In
Chinese) 2005(03)
15.Yu Y;Yang Y;Liu XD Probe on the resistant ability of plants to formaldehyde 2007
16.Zhou JH;Qin FF;Su J Purification of formaldehydepolluted air by indoor plants of Araceae,Agavaceae and
Liliaceae 2011(3,4)
17.周晓晶,梁双燕,金幼菊,王骏,赵惠恩 13种常用室内观赏植物对甲醛净化效果[期刊论文]-中国农学通报 2006(12)

引证文献(2条)
1.欧坚泉,周俊辉,陈水渐,岳保超 几种盆栽植物对甲醛的净化作用[期刊论文]-北方园艺 2012(22)
2.何勤勤,周俊辉 盆栽植物对室内甲醛空气污染的净化研究进展[期刊论文]-江西农业学报 2014(02)


引用本文格式：周俊辉.岳宝超.陈水渐.徐会连.ZHOU Jun-Hui.YUE Bao-Chao.CHEN Shui-Jian.XU Hui-Lian 竹芋科和蕨类室内
盆栽植物对甲醛净化作用的研究[期刊论文]-广西植物 2012(6)