免费文献传递   相关文献

Optimization of extraction conditions of soybean protein isolated from low temperature soybean meal by response surface methodology

响应面法优化低温豆粕大豆分离蛋白提取工艺



全 文 :!10
"!

#
2012
$

%
M
 

 
Ê
 
“
 
Ë
 
Ì
ChineseJournalofBioprocessEngineering
Vol.10No.3
May2012
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3678.2012.03.008
OPQI
:2011-10-06
KCR!

ÍÎÏÐÑo)ÒÓÔÕÖ
(31101348,31000780);
‹º8JÉÚÛÓÔÕÖ
(09CG50);
%a1o0ùÑoýÄÅÍÎ×Ørs
tJ)¯DÓÔÕÖ
(SKLFKF201106);
‹º8ÆÇM(À)ÒÓÔÕÖ
ST.U

,K¼
(1987—),
m

àáM`ã

påÆÇM

ÆÇæç

0ùÓuÚYFG

§
 
L

‚êã
),
ïëì
,Email:gnxo@163.com
k$•ÙÚëɖ—]–r˜€™š›{|
.š›
1,
œ
 

1,
wžŸ

(1.
 v‡79: ™¡¢£=~:A

 v
200093;2.
,–¤¥~¦8§¨©ª«¬

56
210041)
7
 
l

íåFFÔÖÓ&
(RSM)
"ÕôÖׁÖÖØÆÙ
(soybeanproteinisolated,SPI)
¬ÚÏJæçb(

ù3ÛÜab¬N´_

fݞEF
SPI
ÏÝÒ¬

Y”ÞÛÜ
(pH、
ôó

³ßÓàãC

æçáÛÜâ<ã¬û
ä¢)åšabæç
(CCRD)。
¾¿
RSM
DŒžFFs
(SPI
ÏÝÒ

@9EFÛÜè߬éêë¡

hgў
SPI
¬IbÏÝKL
:pH85,
ÏÝôó
55℃,
Ïݳß
428min,
ã1∶97(g/mL),
ìKLv
SPI
ÏÝÒî™

3712%,
@abs
(3669%)
¬íîá
116%。
ïð[ÚÏSñòæçª[ÚÏ

ª[ÏÝÒá
1016%。2
[ÚÏ_óàDôõö÷¬ÆÙö÷ÒÖ×á
8403%
Ó
8584%。
mno

ÏÝ

Ö×

ÖÆÙ

FFÔ&
pqrst
:TS2142    
6uvBw
:A    
6x;t
:1672-3678(2012)03-0039-06
Optimizationofextractionconditionsofsoybeanproteinisolatedfrom
lowtemperaturesoybeanmealbyresponsesurfacemethodology
CHENZihan1,GUANXiao1,LIJingjun2
(1.SchoolofMedicalInstrumentsandFoodEngineering,UniversityofShanghaiforScienceandTechnology,Shanghai200093,China;
2.JiangsuYurunFoodIndustryGroupCo,Ltd,Nanjing210041,China)
Abstract:Thealkaliextractionprocessofsoybeanproteinisolated(SPI)fromlowtemperaturesoybean
mealwasoptimizedbyresponsesurfacemethoclology(RSM)Basedonthesinglefactorexperiments,the
fourkeyfactors,includingpH,temperature,time,andwatermaterialratiowereselectedtodesignthe
fourfactorsfivelevelscentralcompositerotatableexperimentsdesign(CCRD)Theregressionequation
betweenresponsevalues(SPIextractionrate)andfourfactorswasestablishedbyRSMFurthermore,
theoptimizedextractionconditionsofSPIweredeterminedaspH850,temperatureof55℃,timeof
428min,andmaterialwaterratioof1∶97(g/mL)Undertheseconditions,3712% proteinextrac
tionrationwaspredictedComparedwiththeacturalproteinextractionratio3669%,therelativeeror
was116%,itshowedthattheoptimizedconditionswerefeasibleMoreover,thesecondproteinextrac
tionrateofresiduewas1016%.Theproteinprecipitationratesoftwostepalkalineextractionsolution
were8403% and8584%,respectively.
Keywords:extraction;soybeanmeal;soybeanprotein;responsesurfacemethodology
  
‹ŒŽ

í.~1MtËÌs·G‹Œ
3¡“”

5Øò¡Ã.ìð
(NSI)
Íû>1
Ž
[1]。
/*‹ŒŽàQûò¡Ã.ì~û}
¼˜ø=Ø

çýQíFG‹ŒŽ

ÈA–‘û
1}>1ʓÂðŒZóÈ>ÆÇ,Ø

  
8j‹>1}_·Q5¤

A¤í1
…æ}

í.ÿ‹ŒŽóal

Ë=H

P
Høʓæ‰

ªh‹ŒŽs>ò¡¯Ki

î
i–E7ò¡¯>ü˜Zi

SÍH}¼˜‘
û
65%~70%
>}
[2];
!<¤í1i}

(soybeanproteinisolated,SPI),
ÿŽóa
l

·G7‘=éø“”bc>}¼˜
90%
ÿ
‹>:ù
[3]。
1i}sh)=EZYª

óXšû
[4-5],
ûàQ#Ö>¡Ã¯

2X¯

Ú


›Â¯~çO¯

Œ&LßG*0ùʓ>
ë]Vã
[6]。
  
1i}>bcæ‰_··G7‘=é
‰
[7],
O‰ŠØ~*Ze‹

ñò†

.‰~}
‘’š‹ø9Ì
[5]。
çýŠX1i}>M
:“”

‘ûEؚí1}æpP¬Ãº>
xD

  
QRÿ‹ŒŽóal

~,¿rs>)
ً


pH、
ŒU

<Ê~lþ

]NO>}
‘’,¿Èæs°EYrs

!Ë@‡ˆ‰
ižØåΊ>“”‘’

ÿ#órg“pM:
‘—ªLì™~.y

1 
~%€
11 
þß~
  
‹ŒŽ

%QXRSX“Q¸´µ

ƒ=

NaOH、CuSO4、K2SO4、…H2SO4øÇóÍ:ižB;
T“U§}

‹ºÍÀ§}Q¸´µ

12 
:lœ:
  
µ-œð

8jN©F–»¹êqQ¸´
µ

ô‚VnÊ,ïð¹

‹ºpɵ-ÑÄQ
¸´µ

ì/Ý]¨ŒÈ

WFœ¨»¹X

YZ
[WVЇ¹

YZX£b
;pHS 25
Áìê
pH
Ú

‹ºž\Ño»¹Q¸´µ
;AvantiJ 20XP
û™³î°R

zÍ]»^ñf=Q¸´µ

WFJ7200
ÁòÄiÉÉUÚ

S<_

ܼ

»
¹Q¸´µ
;HN 01`
DžŸ»

‹ºyùiž
»¹Q¸´µ

13 
þ߀
131 
‹ŒŽal_·Zi>££
  
‹ŒŽ}¼˜>££·G¢–ü˜`D
£ò‰

ò0}—>³Xêìó
571);
Âi¼˜
>££·G
105℃
¨—˜‰

ò¡Ã.ì>££·
G
BSISO15323 2000
>££æ‰

TU¼˜>£
£·G;D‘‰

132 
1i}>‘’
  

20g
‹ŒŽal

ª*¨ŒYZ[W
VЇ¹s

ÛA£>lÂþʒȘžŸÂ

!
9Gïð

*aʒ
1mol/LNaOH
.ùal
pH
‘’A£<ÊÞ
,3500r/min
°
15min,
Ð
ޘ’‹®>–?

!££‹®s>}
…U

  
³Y÷bVЇ¹sÈæ
ò†;
‹

‡

b7‘>‹®i†~
pH45、40℃
‘’
"ïðé¢
30min,
°Þ’‹®

!££}
…U

133 
1i}¼˜>££–Úô
  
}®s}¼˜>££·GT“U‰

}‘’š
=m(‘’s})m(
als«}
)×100% (1)
}é¢š

m(
‘’s}
)-m(
®s}

m(
‘’s}
) ×100% (2)
}Øš

}‘’š
×
}é¢š
×100% (3)
134 
rsÚ
  
~,¿rs)ً

ÿ1i}‘’š
ó@‡ð

}~,¿sYÈ>ÏZ˜!ü£ÏZ
˜Âð

Èæs°EYrsÚ

·G
DesignExpert
70


Ë
RSM
0ì™Èæ0c¯iž


êÖ¯¢s

ÿü£ÎŠ“”‘’

óÈA–ü£
Áò€¯

0µØªLðßso¯rs

2 
†‡%ˆ)
21 
ëɖ—8:lìri¨’†‡
  
‹ŒŽal_·Zi>££ÂÃçz

µ
è

/z

òÅ

‹ŒŽs}¼˜~ò¡Ã.
ì‚û

;
àQ‹ŒŽ¢Q>§
¹~¸d

ÿ‹ÂÃýÍί°ì™0`òÅ

r
ss}~>‹ŒŽeYÍί°

튗>Ž
al

04
M
 

 
Ê
 
“
 
Ë
 
Ì
  
!
10
"
 
 1 
ëɖ—8:lìr
Table1 Principlecomponentsoflowtemperature
soybeanmeal
w(
Âi
)% w(¨
}—
)%
ò¡Ã.ì
w(
TU
)%
891 5408 8414 083
 
22 
¯Xþß\]–r˜€™š›,iÙÚ
221 pH
01i}‘’š>?@
  
Û`‘’1i}>ò†ËÌ

~ŒUó
40℃、

40min、
lÂþ
1∶10(g/mL)
>‘’"

i†VW9;
pH
0}‘’š>?@

ÂÃçY

µè

/Y

òÅ

}‘’šË
pH
>`ûÍP
1

ûËÌ
pH
>`û

x >=š*+P1

øÞ
‘’šP1>™š*+ÊÑ

.
pH
Ëû0:ù>
¸d

s~ð–Þ#>=éËÌÏ=:M9F?
@
[8]。

pH
–ês

}—fÁ–=8MÃf

f•8M}—«>G5

HØ}—i-Âu
~RF¯—Ç{9;ÌU7g
[9]。
þ7`ò[
Ú}>3h

3Lÿ–

€g

Ї

MZQáX


ú‹1i}³xüð
[10]。
ڋµá

‘’ËÌs
pH
Ah9áÝË
90。
q
1 
š›
pH
\€™š›,ijk
Fig.1 EfectofpHonratioofproteinextraction
222 
ŒU01i}‘’š>?@
  
ŒU0}¡ÃU>?@Í1

,^=?@}
>‘’š
[5]。
~‘’
pH85、

40min、

þ
1∶10(g/mL)
>‘’"

VWŒU0}‘’š
>?@

ÂÃçY

µè

/Y

òÅ

ŒUS
20℃
‹`
55℃,
}>‘’š*+‘û

ŒU1
*
55℃
<

‘’šPʙšZÓ

Éޑ’šJ¾
ú‹

  
ŒUËû<

},Z¯>ÌU*+PÊ

[
Ú}i->fÁ†G

=ú‹}>¡ÃU

S
q
2 
š›É\€™š›,ijk
Fig.2 Efectofextractiontemperatureon
ratioofproteinextraction
Í=y8‘’š"ú

ȌUû*
55℃
<

}—
J¾Z¯

ŒU¹`û
10℃,
}—Z¯>™šÊ
Ñ
600
éãä
[11]。
}Z¯9ä=?@:ùRF
¯—

~rsò†ËÌsîåù1‘’çUPÊ
>ù±

;<ûŒîêÐù)íFPÊ

µÿ‡~
ˆo9•*H}8M,Z¯>‘"

Èȑû
ŒU)‘û}>‘’š

223 
<Ê01i}‘’š>?@
  
¢£‘’
pH
ó
85、
ŒU
40℃、
lÂþ
1∶10
(g/mL)
>‘’9Z

VWЇ<Ê0}‘’š>
?@

ÂÃÄY
3。
/Y

òÅ

S
20min


Ë
‘’<Ê>՗

}‘’šåù1Þê>‹`

ȑ’<ÊÝË
60min
<

}‘’š)eˆ›9
Z

ÑøÞ}>¡åõ*m5>ð:
[12]。
¸HÈ
A–Õ—<Ê

0}>‘’š?@fü

;<Ú
YëՓ”Ze

‘’<ʇ~
40~60min
óá

q
3 
š›LM\€™š›,ijk
Fig.3 Efectofextractiontimeonratioof
proteinextraction
224 
lÂþ01i}‘’š>?@
  
~
pH85、
ŒU
40℃、

40min
>‘’"

VWlÂþ0}‘’š>?@

ÂÃÄY
4。
/
Y

òÅ

ʘܩ

}>‘’šÜû

.íÈ
14 
!

# ,K¼ø

@‡ˆ‰ŠX‹ŒŽ1i}‘’“”
ÊÂË©<

}‘’>ìþídÐÍú‹


ˆí,ó=é<2®s¡Ã>m}˜PÊ

}
>‰Ö˜PÊ

>ZZù>ؚ"ú
[10];
€Aæ
ˆ

Ëʘ>PÊ

i<Ê՗

;<c>Ì
ÓîËÉÊ1
[13]。
,^ÈÈ>lÂþ~
1∶10
ãä

q
4 
—\€™š›,ijk
Fig.4 Efectofsolvetomaterialratioonratio
ofproteinextraction
23 
k$•ÙÚ]–r˜€™iš›{|
231 
s°EY§sÚ
  
~ŠX1i}‘’>,¿§s)Ù
‹

}~‘’
pH、
ŒU



lÂþóÏZ˜

û™
CentralCompositeRotatableDesign
Ú>aª

·G
DesignExpert70
D’Úô,¿iÂð>s°E
Y§s

s°EY§sÚ>,¿

Âð–ÂÃÄ
z
2。
eÆdzQ
31
]§sØ

Ess°ØQ

]

G*9ڧsΉ

232 
@‡ˆ‰ŠX}‘’š>ÂÃiž
  
·G
DesignExpert70
D’0z

s>§sÂ
ÃÈæ©$0c
ÿ}‘’šó@
‡ð
Y,
؏…æÌç"

Y=1640988-903506X1+0013176X2+
0944813X3 -3603 11X4 -0044 345X

1 +
0108875X1X2+0007875X1X3+1281875X1X4-
0002386X22-0001581X2X3-0019781X2X4-
0011823X23+0000719X3X4-0259647X


  
0‹áÁÈææ‰iž

ÂÃÄz
3。
  
/z

òÅ
:P<00001,
zޏÁæÌ0cê
Ö

ÂÃò€

;<Á>օ¯
P=03023,

Ö

zèÁ>Ήò
[14];
Á>º£êì
(R2)
ó
0932,
øÞÏZ˜ý@‡ðÉÊNêêÖ
[15]。
Ú
‹µá
,^
Á0§sÂÃ>…Y¯#Ö

FG0
cæÌ0§sÈæiž~â£íYª>

 
2 
pž¤÷Þߜa%†‡
Table2 Designandresultsofthecentralcomposite
rotatableexperiment
rsÍ
X1
pH
X2ŒU/

X3<Ê/
min
X4lÂþ/
(g·mL-1)
}‘
’š
Y/%
1 -2(70)0(45) 0(35) 0(1∶10) 1876
2 -1(75)-1(35)-1(25) -1(1∶8) 1509
3 -1 -1 -1 1(1∶12) 1696
4 -1 -1 1(45) -1 165
5 -1 -1 1 1 1827
6 -1 1 -1 -1 2100
7 -1 1 -1 1 2134
8 -1 1 1 -1 2449
9 -1 1 1 1 2408
10 0(80) -2(25) 0 0 1470
11 0 0 -2(15) 0 1934
12 0 0 0 -2(1∶6) 2204
13 0 0 0 0 2427
14 0 0 0 0 2485
15 0 0 0 0 2636
16 0 0 0 0 2831
17 0 0 0 0 2937
18 0 0 0 0 2555
19 0 0 0 0 2708
20 0 0 0 2(1∶14) 2247
21 0 0 2(55) 0 2402
22 0 2(65) 0 0 3621
23 1(85) -1 -1 -1 1774
24 1 -1 -1 1 2673
25 1 -1 1 -1 2395
26 1 -1 1 1 2832
27 1 1(55) -1 -1 3069
28 1 1 -1 1 3320
29 1 1 1 -1 3872
30 1 1 1 1 3694
31 2(90) 0 0 0 3397
24
M
 

 
Ê
 
“
 
Ë
 
Ì
  
!
10
"
 
 3 
€™š›,
(Y)
Ÿ ^_€zr…
Table3 ANOVAofproteinextraction(Y)model
æ‰)u ðæ~ Ï/U æ‰

ð
P>F
Á
98978 14 7070 1560 <00001
X1 40830 1 40830 9008 <00001
X2 41592 1 41592 9177 <00001
X3 3241 1 3241 715 00166
X4 3387 1 3387 747 00147
X21 3515×10-3 1 3515×10-3 7750×10-4 09781
X1X2 474 1 474 105 03216
X1X3 2481×10-2 1 2481×10-2 5473×10-3 09419
X1X4 2629 1 2629 580 00284
X22 163 1 163 03591 05573
X2X3 040 1 040 00883 07702
X2X4 250 1 250 05525 04681
X23 3997 1 3997 882 00090
X3X4 3306×10-3 1 3306×10-3 7290×10-4 09788
X24 3085 1 3085 681 00190
÷‰
7252 16 453
օ¯
5240 10 524 156 03023
BΉ
2012 6 335
«‰
106230 30
233 
@‡ˆiž
  
/z

òÅ
:2
]AbÕ
(pH、
ŒU
),1
]Õ



0}‘’š?@™óêÖ
(P<001);
€‰

]AbÕ



lÂþ
),1
]

þ

~

]ـÕ
(pH
ýlÂþ

0‘’šÂÃ?
@êÖ
(P<005)。
/^òÅ

µ}~>

]ÏZ
˜0}‘’šÇQ9;ÌU>?@

  
ÿ‘’
pH
~lÂþ01i}‘’š>
?@óI†@‡ˆýøû Y

Y
5)。
/Y

ò
Å

¢£
pH
~<Ê

],¿

ËÌ
pH
>`û

‘’
šô ¯P1

ÍlÂþ0‘’š>?@óx Z
X
,¸
P1ވ›9Z

ð:Øåù~
1∶10
(g/mL)
ãä

;<

~‘’
pH
͋<

x ZX
ÍÞê

û
pH
‘’?@"*

  
1i}>‘’š{‘’<Ê~lÂþ
>?@êÖ

Y
6)。
/Y

òÅ

~
pH
~ŒUˆ›
9Z>ïð"

Ë̑’<Ê~lÂþ>PÊ

‘
’šÏåù1`ûÞ«{ð:à5>ZXËÌ

!û~EsA]?@,¿©*ÍûÂð<

€A]
?@,¿{Ebú¯Qµ"*

’š>ZX
ÕÊðÓ

234 
Ί‘’>žÃ–so§s
  
û™…YæÌ

ìÚôØåΊ‘’‘’
:pH
q
5 Y=f(X1,X4)ik$•%¡R]
(X2=45,X3=3311)
Fig.5 Responsesurfaceandcontourlinesfor
Y=f(X1,X4)(X2=45,X3=3311)
850,
ŒU
55℃,

428min,
lÂþ
1∶97
(g/mL),
~^‘’"â£1i}‘’šó
3712%,
ªöUó
933%。
  
óÈA–soeÁ01i}‘’š
>â£Fn

FGÿ‹ÎŠ‘’Èæ

bם}
‘’

0â£}‘’šÈæso

ÂÃzÞ

ð
Çrg}‘’šó
3669%,
â£ðýdrðÉ
Ê>Ήäó
116%,
zÞ@‡ˆ‰01i}
‘’šŠX>ÂÃíYªQí>

34 
!

# ,K¼ø

@‡ˆ‰ŠX‹ŒŽ1i}‘’“”
q6 Y=f(X3,X4)ik$•%¡R]
(X1=8,X2=45)
Fig.6 Responsesurfaceandcontourlinesfor
Y=f(X3,X4)
(X1=8,X2=45)
  
ers؏>1i}>‘’šÞêû
*¥¦
[2]
s>ÂÃ

øފXíÃíêÖ>

€
‰

ers·G>s°EY§sÚàQêèª
É

â£ÂÞüøŠö

235 
  
‡Ab7‘Þ>÷bÈæ
ë¤ì
ªólÂþ
1∶5(g/mL),pH、
ŒU~<ÊýAb7
‘>Ί‘’ˆ›A8

Ðއ

b7‘®Èæ

,2
b7‘>‘’š

颚~ؚÂÃÄz
4。
/z

òÅ

1i}>‘’
ši†ó
3669%
~
1016%,
,^«‘’šò{
4685%,
;<

1i}>Ø
šó
3952%。
/^òÅ

0÷bÈæÿÈA–‘û1i}>‘’š

Î1ÌUr
ù1ŽÓu>piFG

Ñýÿbøóal
ÈæÂÃ
SA8
[8,10]。
 
4 
]–r˜€™iš›,

¢£,Ƥ,
Table4 Extractionresultsofsoybeanprotein

‘’bì ‘’š 颚 ؚ
Ab7‘
3669 8403 3083
1016 8584 869
 
3 
†
 
)
  
S?@1i}‘’š>_·,¿
(pH、
ŒU

<Ê~lÂþ

’£

Ë,¿rsü£ë
ÏZ˜–SNÂð

~^)ًÈæs°EY4³
rsÚ

!·G@‡ˆ‰01i}>‘’
‘’ÈæŠX
:pH850,
ŒU
55℃,

428min,
lÂþ
1∶97(g/mL),
}‘’š>â£ðó
3712%。
^‘’"so§s>‘’šó
3669%,
116%,
øފXÂÃídròö>

  
‡‘’÷bÈæ
1016%。
‡

b‘’‹®i†ÈæøµØé¢

颚i†ó
8403%
~
8584%,
}Øši†ó
3083%
~
869%,
,^‹ŒŽ1i}ì
5b7‘Þ}«Øšó
3952%。
M©6u

[1] 
jk

lm

noo

ø

‹Œ1ŽM:C>“”ÆÇ
[J].
p0ýql“p
,2003(11):4243.
[2] 
§¤Ó

£rs

At

ø

9;“”bc>1…æ}R
F=¯>þÍ
[J].
0ùÆÇýJ8
,2010,31(2):1214.
[3] 
uk

v¥˜

Ôw<

ø

9;“”‘’01i}‘
’š>?@
[J].
sÍtT
,2011,36(2):1619.
[4] 
D-S

źÕ

xˆS

ø

1i}M:“”ýry
[J].
sÍtT
,2004,29(11):2930.
[5] 
+z•

1i}–Eb’
[J].
p0ý0ù“p
,2004,
12(2):710.
[6] KinselaJE.Functionalpropertiesofsoyproteins[J].JAmOil
ChemSoc,1979,56(3):242258.
[7] SteveM.Soyproteinapplicationinfoods[C]∥CISE2002Tech
nicalCommitee.2002China&InternationalConference&Exhi
bition.[s.l.]:ChineseCerealsandOilsAssociation,2002:
158159.
[8] 
A{

Ì|

u¨X

1i}>M:“”
[J].
sÍ2ù
“”
,2002,30(5):110112.
[9] 
}/§

1i}M:“”T6
[J].
p0ʓý0ùR
~
,2006(11):56.
[10] 
m=
,`
Þ

‘’1i}>“”ÆÇ
[J].
ptʓ
ý0ùR~
,2005(9):4751.
[11] 
)۩

©©

Ur‚

1i}>M:“”–E~0
ù“ps>‡G
[J].
p0ʓ
,2002(4):5356.
[12] 
ÜN;

+¤/



ø

RF¯1i}>bc
[J].
sÍpto*
,1999,14(3):3235.
[13] 
,M

ƒT1i}>M:<Ê
[J].
sÍtT
,2008,33
(6):2627.
[14] 
`ç„

ýޅ

§sÚý
DesignExpert、SPSS
‡G
[M].
8j

Ñoå9:
,2010:155160.
[15] GuanXiao,YaoHuiyuan.OptimizationofviscozymeLassisted
extractionofoatbranproteinusingresponsesurfacemethodology
[J].FoodChemistry,2008,106:345351.
44
M
 

 
Ê
 
“
 
Ë
 
Ì
  
!
10
"